[RTTY] JARTS RTTY Coming Soon!

Thu Oct 11 14:03:44 EDT 2012

Hello Hisami,

thanks for taking care of the SWLs issue.

About the few participants you are right, only five SWL participated in 2011
(but a little more than the two participants in the 1996 edition).

And also about the licence you are right, now it is much easier to get a
license, also here in Italy. But precisely for thia reason you don't think
that it will be useful to give the opportunity to the new entries to gain
experience by participating in the Contest as SWL before entering as Ham?

Vy 73 de
Dan, I1-12387

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of 7L4IOU
Sent: giovedi 11 ottobre 2012 10.55
To: rtty at contesting.com
Cc: k4adr at comcast.net; NCCC; ed at w0yk.com; Rick
Subject: Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Coming Soon!

Hello Friends,

Thank you very much for the opinions.

--- about 48hr operation.
I think that the 48 hour period was not rare 20 years ago
 and many guys were smoking.
time now health is regarded as important.
Tobacco was stopped and long time operation became hard to me too.

I think it realistic to prepare rest time system.

--- about short time and single band categories.
cost must increase, so sponsor's intention is important.
PDF award may be necessity.

--- about SWL
Sorry about that but there are few participants year by year.
the equipment and license became very easy.
I hope SWLs are challenge to QSO category.

These are just personal opinion
 and there are various opinions in JARTS too.

We will discuss.

Hope to see you soon.
73, Hisami 7L4IOU

>Food for thought !!!
>Of course to be eligible for that you would have to limit the op time
>to a couple hours. Otherwise the 48 hour guys will grab that too !!
>
>Rick - WU6W
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>k4adr at comcast.net
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 4:40 PM
>To: Rick
>Cc: NCCC; 7L4IOU; ed at w0yk.com; rtty at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Coming Soon!
>
>
>
>How about this, the most contacts in a 60 minute window. So you have
>to contest for1 hour.
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>
>From: "Rick" <RickPalio at att.net>
>To: ed at w0yk.com, "7L4IOU" <7l4iou at jarts.jp>
>Cc: "NCCC" <nccc at contesting.com>, rtty at contesting.com
>Sent: Monday, October 8, 2012 12:14:16 PM
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Coming Soon!
>
>"Think about what our contests would be like if the only participants
>were those who thought they had a chance to win!"
>
>Very well said ED.
>This is a point most organizers and avid "to Win" contesters do not
>even think about and they should.
>How many times have you been "brushed off" by some rabid, "going for
>the gold", guy ?? I still remember those experiences when I was a
>rookie contester !!
>
>Yes, we have an ageing group in the Ham community and some of us old
>guys just don't have the stamina to put in 30 - 48 hours.
>The most fun I personally have are the NAQP contests because they are
>do-able for me.
>
>Anyhow, glad you mentioned that point and I hope some more awareness
>is generated from it.
>
>Rick - WU6W
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed Muns
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 7:34 AM
>To: '7L4IOU'
>Cc: rtty at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY Coming Soon!
>
>I agree that 48-hour contests are a physical and mental challenge that
>I personally haven't mastered. I've never been able to stay conscious
>for the full two days without breaks. But this shortcoming is not the
>only thing that lowers my chance of winning. If a good operator at a
>bigger and/or better-located station participates, then my chances of
>winning decrease.
>If not, then my chances of winning increase. These are all things I
>have no control over.
>
>So, I've decided that "the journey is more important (and, satisfying)
>than the destination". I can control "the journey", that is, whether I
>participate and how hard I try to operate the best I can from whatever
>station I'm at. If I win at some level, that is wonderful too, but its
>not the main reason I contest. I contest because I enjoy operating
>with high activity and improving my operating skill.
>
>For example, I operated 9 hours of the 24 allowed for single-ops in
>the CQP (California QSO Party) this past weekend. There was no way I
>could be competitive, but this didn't keep me from participating as
>strong as I could for the 9 hours I could get on. I had two huge
>reasons for not participating, but I ignored them. First, my 20, 40
>and 80 meter antennas have not been repaired from last winter's damage.
>Second, I had work events that I could not miss. But, there were 9
>hours I could operate on 10, 15 and 160 and I thoroughly enjoyed it.
>
>Think about what our contests would be like if the only participants
>were those who thought they had a chance to win! There would be very
>few stations to work and contesting would die. Most contest
>participation continues to increase because it is an ideal time to
>operate.
>
>I hope there is lots of participation in the JARTS WW RTTY Contest
>because that makes it successful and more fun for everyone.
>
>Ed W0YK
>
>
>Steve, ZC4LI, replied:
>> 48 hour SOAB Category is a bit too much in this day and age, for me
>> anyway.
>> I and no doubt many others like to compete to win and unless you do
>> the full 48 hours then you do not give yourself a chance.
>> If you do not have a chance then there is no point in entering the
>> contest.
>>
>> Maybe you would consider putting in more categories say SOSB, and 24
>> and 12 hour cats for us oldies who can't whack the 48 anymore.
>
>
>Hisami, 7L4IOU, wrote:
>> The JARTS WW RTTY is held on Oct. 20-21.
>>
>> We have the great pleasure to invite you to the 21th WW RTTY CONTEST
>> conducted by the Japanese Amateur Radio Teleprinter Society, JARTS.
>>
>> 2012 Rules and 2011 Results are online at http://www.jarts.jp
>>
>> if you have any questions, please email to questions at jarts.jp
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>-----
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2013.0.2677 / Virus Database: 2591/5817 - Release Date: 10/08
>/12
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>-----
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2013.0.2677 / Virus Database: 2591/5817 - Release Date: 10/08
>/12
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty