[RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter?

Robert Chudek - K0RC k0rc at citlink.net
Fri Aug 23 14:02:33 EDT 2013


"...but experience tells me narrow is better for contesting, perhaps 
wider for weak signals but if they are that weak most won't hear them at 
all during a contest which is why DXing if different from Contesting."

Succinctly stated, and mirrors my contesting experience as well. When 
you have 4 or 5 signals at 20 dB/S9 "fighting" for the same 1 kHz of 
spectrum during a contest, weak signal detection is at the bottom of 
your list of problems you face trying to work and confirm them!

Your next opportunity to enjoy this 'problem' will be next month, 
September 28 & 29 during the CQ WW RTTY DX Contest. I hope to see you then!

http://tinyurl.com/lmz5tsd

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 8/23/2013 10:19 AM, Jay WS7I wrote:
> Joe-
>
> You are just simply wrong. And in any case the question was about 
> filters not the signal.  Been using stacked 250 Hz filters for over 30 
> years on Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu radio's.  They simply work in RTTY 
> contesting always have and always will.  Theory, math, which I trust 
> Chen on far more than I believe you may indicate something else but 
> experience tells me narrow is better for contesting,  perhaps wider 
> for weak signals but if they are that weak most won't hear them at all 
> during a contest which is why DXing if different from Contesting.
>
>
> On 8/23/2013 8:05 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>> And most FSK signals are 370 Hz wide or more
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



More information about the RTTY mailing list