[RTTY] WPX suggestion
Alejandro XE1EE
xe1ee at telmexmail.com
Thu Feb 7 19:20:12 EST 2013
Agree on eliminate the 599, is not needed; including on real signals of 333 everyone sends 599 because is part of the macro we send.
However if this is stated on the rules (RST plus serial number) we must send it, or we can earn a yellow card or anything we don’t like to receive.
73
*********************
XE1EE
Alejandro Valdez
www.dxxe.org
www.qsl.net/xe1ee
Twitter: @xe1ee
***********************
From: Bill Turner
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 6:05 PM
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:55:46 -0800, you wrote:
>You are sending four extra characters. If you make 1000 QSOs that's at
>least 4000 extra characters, not counting repeats.
REPLY:
OOPS... I forgot that as your number goes up, the number of leading zeroes
go down.
So it wouldn't be 4000 extra zeroes, only a few till you get to 100 and
then no more.
No wonder I never win these things. :-)
But by the same token, how about eliminating the useless 599? Since this
would be saved both transmitting and receiving, now you're talking some
real savings.
Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
More information about the RTTY
mailing list