[RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users

[Robert Chudek - K0RC]

This discussion / education thread would be a great opportunity to apply 
the "Fair Use" clause of the US Copyright Statutes. In that context, 
excerpts from copyrighted materials could be posted here to further 
educate the reflector participants. In other words, few in the audience 
have access to old issues of IEEE Proceedings, 73, CQ, QST, or other 
technical journals that may contain a technical article relevant to this 
topic. Citing your source is, of course, prudent.

I am not a lawyer. That is my opinion.

Here's a reference to copyright Fair Use: 
http://copyright.lib.utexas.edu/copypol2.html

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/21/2013 11:28 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2013 12:04 PM, Kok Chen wrote:
>>
>> BTW, you can include references in your comments to the RM, and the
>> references can include Web links, references to RTTY Bulletins from
>> the 1950s, or email to your kids, if those are pertinent. Please
>> feel free to do all the web research that you need and include
>> references that you decide are pertinent to include in your own
>> comments.
>
> It will be helpful if those who have specific references to discussions
> and filings concerning these matters post them here for others to use
> in bolstering and documenting any claims they make in rely comments.
>
> Fortunately, ARRL have provided a treasure trove of historical data
> on the support for "traditional radioteleprinter bandwidths" (which
> just happens to be a slightly less than 300 Hz for 45.45 baud/170 Hz
> shift) in their own filing.
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>