[RTTY] Self serving lies from the ARRL Letter
Don Hill AA5AU
aa5au at bellsouth.net
Fri Nov 22 01:25:59 EST 2013
Joe wrote:
Since there is no way to file comments until the Commission assigns an RM number ... I recommend others file additional "Petitions
for Rule Making" that asks that the maximum bandwidth in the current MF and HF "RTTY, Data" allocations be set at 500 Hz -
"consistent with historical use of traditional radioteleprinter bandwidths" and other modern data modes such as PSK31, JT65A, JT9,
etc, and that wider bandwidth digital modes such as PACTOR 3, PACTOR 4, M110A/B/C, ALE, etc. be grouped with phone and image
transmission due to their 2.8 KHz compatible bandwidth.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
This is an excellent idea. I have actually been thinking about this very thing. I just don't know how to go about it. Anyone in this
group have experience in doing this? It certainly need to be well thought out and well written.
Or is this a good idea? What are the chances of there being enough comments against the present proposal to make the FCC turn it
down? Is it better to fight on one front or two?
Don AA5AU
More information about the RTTY
mailing list