[RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 131, Issue 67

[Dave Barr]

5 watt K2 power level set:

CW:  4.41 watts on 20;  4.25 on 15;  3.95 on 10.
RTTY:   4.37 on 20;  3.96 on 15;  3.61 on 10  with audio level above 
saturation.

These figures are probably about as accurate as the component values, 
plus you mentioned the not so proper diode.  The important thing for me 
is that I am not running 7 watts for qrp.

I will do more careful measurements soon, and get out my magnifying 
glass to read the diode.

db/YG

On 11/29/2013 6:59 PM, rtty-request at contesting.com wrote:
> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
> 	rtty at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	rtty-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	rtty-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: ARRL attack on current RTTY users (John Becker)
>     2. eCFR listing of Part 97 (Peter Laws)
>     3. Re: It's spreading (Sam Leslie --- W4PK)
>     4. Re: It's spreading (Bill Turner)
>     5. Re: It's spreading (Ron Kolarik)
>     6. Re: ARRL attack on current RTTY users (Joe Subich, W4TV)
>     7. Re: RM-11708 has been amended. (Peter Laws)
>     8. Re: RM-11708 has been amended. (Kai)
>     9. Re: RM-11708 has been amended. (Peter Laws)
>    10. Re: Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708
>        (Peter Laws)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:57:42 -0600
> From: John Becker <w0jab at big-river.net>
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users
> Message-ID: <5298FFC6.9020101 at big-river.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 2:43 PM, Kok Chen wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2013, at 12:07 PM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> who owns the  rights  to PACTOR?
>> I believe it is Special Communications Systems GmbH & Co. KG ("SCS" in short).  KG is the equivalent to our "limited partnership."
> CORRECT you are.
> I have the link to the copyright and patent office on the other
> computer. But is pages and pages of stuff.
> Got about a week of reading?
>
> John, W0JAB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:13:24 -0600
> From: Peter Laws <plaws at plaws.net>
> To: RTTY contest group <rtty at contesting.com>
> Subject: [RTTY] eCFR listing of Part 97
> Message-ID:
> 	<CANVAiQ9b=WFKbUQbW_LX0QwpppVwwN_xY_Qwymb=iZbaFr67Ug at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> This is a link (that will probably break) that should take you to the
> most current version of 47 CFR 97.
>
>
> http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9417e52ab593090eb4f9a10459aa77e1&node=47:5.0.1.1.6&rgn=div5
>