[RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements

[Phil Sussman]

Jay,

Long time, no QSO. Hope you are well. You're right, most PACTOR-1
was reverse engineered and not licensed.

Meanwhile, RTTY is flexible, yet I believe AMTOR was more robust.
I wonder if there ever was an AMTOR ARQ contest?

73 de Phil - N8PS


--------


Quoting Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj at gmail.com>:

> True there is at least one company that licensed it others that  
> pretty much didn't.
>
> On 10/3/2013 3:22 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
>> As for PacTOR, I didn't think they had open-source anything. They  
>> may have licensed their OTA protocol, but that's not exactly the  
>> same thing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>