[RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

Ron Kolarik rkolarik at neb.rr.com
Sat Oct 19 17:09:42 EDT 2013


Everything that W4TV, W7AY and AA6YQ said should just 
about cover it for you Peter. The backers of the proposal at 
the league are all involved with Winlink one way or another
and the league has adopted Winlink as their emcomm
standard.

Ron
K0IDT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Laws" <plaws at plaws.net>
To: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik at neb.rr.com>
Cc: "RTTY" <rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal


> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik at neb.rr.com> wrote:
> 
>> with Winlink, search 'Winlink wants your frequencies" for the last
>> time this came around under 'band segmentation by bandwidth'.
>> Unless PIII unleashed all over the cw/digital band segments is your
>> idea of a good thing it needs to be killed in it's present form. My
> 
> OK, help me (us) out here.  The League will say "no, that's not what
> this is about" whether it is or not, so what could they point to to
> make what they say true?
> 
> I share your concern about turning all HF digital bands over to
> SailMail, but we need to be ready with counter-arguments as well.


More information about the RTTY mailing list