[RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

[Gary AL9A]

This "NO CODE" ham certainly operates in the CW band.  At the time I took my 
written Extra exam, and passed it with a 100% score BTW, the FCC also 
required a 20 wpm CW test element.  Before I could get my code speed up to 
snuff to take that element of the exam the FCC modified the rules 
eliminating the CW requirement altogether.  My written exam credit was still 
valid however so I applied for and was granted my Extra (NO CODE) license. 
Now, years latter, I happily work CW contests and chase DX at 30 -32 wpm. 
Go figure!

73,
Gary AL9A

-----Original Message----- 
From: John Becker
Sent: October 19, 2013 1:02 PM
To: RTTY contest group
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

On 10/19/2013 2:49 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
> As has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions, John, the sub-bands 
> in which unattended operation is permitted  are not
> exclusively assigned to unattended operation. When it defined these 
> sub-bands, the FCC made it clear that operators of unattended
> stations must mitigate any interference caused by these stations.
>
> Your continued attempts to blame the interference problem on attended 
> stations who venture into frequencies exclusively allocated to
> unattended stations is factually incorrect and intellectually dishonest.
>
>                  Dave, AA6YQ
Dont preach that same old stuff to me Dave.
Try it on those the wonder into the auto sub band then complain very load
about what happens. As has been pointed to you also a number of times.
Seem that the "intellectually dishonest" can be spread around a bit.
Thus the reason a  "NO CODE" ham is not in the CW band.

JAB
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty