[RTTY] Info on RM-11708

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

 > Do I understand you correctly that the ARRL withdrew the RM-11708
 > petition?

No, they have not withdrawn RM-11708 although that would be the right
thing to do.  They withdrew a *PREVIOUS* petition in which they had
asked that the FCC delete the entire table of specified emission types
and replace it with separate subbands for 200 Hz, 500 Hz and 3 KHz
modes.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 4/5/2014 11:32 AM, David Tanks wrote:
> Hi Joe. Do I understand you correctly that the ARRL withdrew the RM-11708 petition? I do not see any reference to that on their website. Maybe I missed it.
>
> Thanks and 73, David AD4TJ
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists at subich.com>
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 10:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Info on RM-11708
>
>
>
> They are not likely to take quick action.  Remember ARRL's "regulation
> by bandwidth" petition lingered quite a while without action before it
> was withdrawn.  ARRL have complained in the current "FCC restructuring"
> process about the significant delays in action on amateur matters - see
> the current ARRL Letter.
>
> 73,
>
>      ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
> On 4/4/2014 7:49 AM, Phil Sussman wrote:
>> Has there been any word on whether the FCC had
>> taken any action?
>>
>> Thanks ES 73,
>>
>> de Phil - N8PS
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>