[RTTY] ARRL Bandplan Committee report online

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

 > In other words: a Winlink + ALE - only subband.   A no-RTTY zone
 > from  14.095-14.112, 10.140-10.150, etc.

Dream on!  How about an automatic operation free zone from 1.8 to 440
MHz?

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 2014-08-06 10:34 PM, Michael Adams wrote:
> Actually, I parsed that paragraph as "some folks would like to see designated subbands to be used only by/with automated services".
>
> In other words: a Winlink + ALE - only subband.   A no-RTTY zone from  14.095-14.112, 10.140-10.150, etc.
>
>
> Michael / N1EN
> ________________________________________
> From: Peter Laws <plaws0 at gmail.com>
>
> ``2. Many comments were raised about what some believe is growing
> interference from automated unattended transmissions, such as used for
> mailbox type operations. Numerous comments stated that there is a
> proliferation of unmanned email “robots” and such transmissions often cause
> interference to narrow band mode users. *Some feel that unattended digital
> stations should be placed in a separate defined sub-band.* ''
>
>
> Really?  OK, then here's my proposed rule:
>
> *§97.221   Automatically controlled digital station.(a) This rule section
> does not apply to an auxiliary station, a beacon station, a repeater
> station, an earth station, a space station, or a space telecommand station.
> (b) A station may be automatically controlled while transmitting a RTTY or
> data emission on the 6 m or shorter wavelength bands, and on the
> 28.120-28.189 MHz, 24.925-24.930 MHz, 21.090-21.100 MHz, 18.105-18.110 MHz,
> 14.0950-14.0995 MHz, 14.1005-14.112 MHz, 10.140-10.150 MHz, 7.100-7.105
> MHz, or 3.585-3.600 MHz segments. *
>
> You really have to wonder who gets on these committees ...
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>