[RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at subich.com
Wed Feb 26 14:30:27 EST 2014
It's known as divide and conquer.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/26/2014 2:24 PM, Jay WS7I wrote:
> That is a bunch of malarkey, they just don't want the phone operators in
> opposition.
>
> On 2/26/2014 9:47 AM, Don AA5AU wrote:
>> I don't understand this one:
>>
>> * Shouldn’t 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth data emissions be restricted
>> to the band segments where phone and image communications are permitted?-
>> While some commenters have argued for that, it is far beyond the scope
>> of the ARRL petition. It would require a complete reordering of the
>> regulatory scheme for the HF bands which would be controversial, to
>> say the least.
>>
>> I don't understand the part about having to completely reorder the
>> regulatory scheme. That sounds like a bunch of malarkey.
>>
>> And are they trying to say the current proposal is not already
>> controversial enough?
>>
>> Don AA5AU
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
More information about the RTTY
mailing list