[RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708

[Aubrey Mansfield]

"Instead, the League said, its Petition is intended to impose “a limitation on the maximum bandwidth of data emissions where none exists now.”
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Aubrey W70LY







On Jan 7, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Don Hill AA5AU <aa5au at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I particularly like this comment:
> 
> "The ARRL further asserted that the fear of interference from automatically controlled stations "is not a valid one."
> 
> Yeah, right!
> 
> Don AA5AU
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 3:14 PM
> To: rtty-contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708
> 
> All,
> 
> I'm appalled that we are misguided fools.... we have mistaken benevolence for threat........
> 
> The Empire has issue the definitive rebuttal to all our
> foolishness: 
> http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reply-comments-cite-fundamental-misunderstanding-of-symbol-rate-petition
> 
> in :
> 
> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017582527
> 
> 73, HNY,
> 
> Ben - WB2RHM 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty