[RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY

[W0MU Mike Fatchett]

Does anyone even copy these bulletins anymore.  There is no way to find 
out.  In this day and age I doubt many do.

Published months in advance do not allow one to break the rules. So if I 
publish my operating schedule on 14.313 months in advance and fire up, 
this is ok?  I think not.

Mike W0MU

On 6/3/2014 9:47 AM, Edwin Karl wrote:
> How about don't blame the victim ... !
>
> I didn't know even the exalted bulletins were special
> and above the rules we all live with (?)
>
> Ed K0KL
>
> On 6/3/2014 10:20 AM, Dick Kriss wrote:
>> Gary AL9A.
>>
>> The W1AW Bulletin station has been doing that for years. The error 
>> was on the part of the W1AW/0 (MO) operator for setting up and 
>> calling CQ on the published W1AW broadcast frequency.
>>
>> It would be interesting to see a poll taken of the amateur community 
>> on the need for ARRL W1AW broadcast station. Broadcasting was good 
>> when it was created but may no longer be useful or used.  Maintaining 
>> a club station for member use has value; however, I would rather see 
>> the operational cost of broadcasting channeled into more useful 
>> projects, like LoTW.
>>
>> Dick AA5VU
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Gary AL9A <al9a at mtaonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In no way is this "amusing".  It is a portent of of what awaits us 
>>> all should RM-11708 be enacted as is.
>>>
>>> Dick, I think you should send a copy of your email to ARRL and ask 
>>> why they interfered with one of their own W1AW portable stations?  
>>> Also ask what are they going to do to insure this doesn't happen 
>>> again to any unfortunate soul who happens to be operating on "their" 
>>> frequency when its time to transmit a ARRL bulletin?
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Gary AL9A
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: David Tanks via RTTY
>>> Sent: June 02, 2014 2:35 PM
>>> To: Dick Kriss ; RTTY Reflector
>>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY
>>>
>>>
>>> This is amusing. The ARRL is touting RM 11708 as being helpful, 
>>> while at the same time QRMing an on-going operation on a frequency 
>>> without checking to see if it is busy! The ARRL does not have a 
>>> right to a frequency if it is occupied already. They are supposed to 
>>> move to prevent QRM, correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> 73, David AD4TJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Dick Kriss <aa5vu at att.net>
>>> To: RTTY Reflector <rtty at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 6:29 PM
>>> Subject: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY
>>>
>>>
>>> I was trying to work W1AW/0 (MO) on RTTY at 18.100 and W1AW home 
>>> bulletin station came on like a PACTOR robot and wiped out any 
>>> chance of working the W1AW/O Centennial station.
>>>
>>> Future W1AW/P RTTY operations should avoid W1AW broadcast frequencies.
>>>
>>> Dick AA5VU
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3955/7615 - Release Date: 
>> 06/03/14
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty