[RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments
Neal Campbell
nealk3nc at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 18:41:02 EST 2014
Careful guys, you are walking in territory that some may not be comfortable
with this line of humor.
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal LLC
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeff AC0C <keepwalking188 at ac0c.com> wrote:
> Why worry? It says right there in the ARRL petition, "...and if you
> like your (outdated, obsolete, antiquated) RTTY, then you can KEEP YOUR
> RTTY. PERIOD."
>
> 73/jeff/ac0c
> www.ac0c.com
> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Joe Subich, W4TV
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:19 AM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments
>
>
>
> This is exactly the kind of spectrum grab that needs to be prevented.
>
> Notice they're already talking about *50 KHz* on 20 meters for the
> *exclusive use* of "fast digital modes." Not only that, they want it
> where *international users* can make use of it and that would for all
> intents and purposes mean a "takeover"or 14.050-14.100! Applied to
> 30 Meters that would be a takeover of at least 15 KHz - on 40 meters
> they would want 45 KHz where it does not interfere with international
> phone use or 7025-7080 (they cant' go into the Extra class segment
> because their users aren't licensed there). On 80 Meters, their 15%
> would take *the entire CW/digital band* except for the Extra class CW
> segment and on 160 meters their 15% (30 KHz) would wipe out the entire
> "CW/data" segment if one starts at 1810 to be compatible with the
> lower frequency limit in many countries.
>
> With 99% of all non-voice activity being conducted using modes less than
> 500 Hz occupied bandwidth (eQSL database), it is clear that 99% of the
> available "RTTY, data" spectrum should be reserved for modes less than
> 500 Hz bandwidth and in no case should wideband activity be permitted
> in *at least* the bottom 100 KHz on each band to protect traditional
> amateur activity.
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
> On 3/2/2014 2:29 PM, Jay WS7I wrote:
>
>> Others are already active.
>>
>> http://hflink.com/bandplans/iaru_region_2.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/2014 10:32 AM, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-board-requests-member-
>>> comments-about-digital-modes
>>>
>>>
>>> Due by 3/31. Seems like they might have asked BEFORE RM-11708.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list