[RTTY] About N4II's experiment...
Kai
k.siwiak at ieee.org
Fri Mar 14 23:52:15 EDT 2014
Bob,
I've meant it as a courtesy to the others on this reflector. We've strayed from
far from RTTY.
73
Kai, KE4PT
On 3/14/2014 9:09 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
> Why does everything have to be "taken off the reflector" for private
> discussion? No one learns a damn thing in that scenario. And isn't that what
> everyone is complaining about in the first place... Decisions made in secret?
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 3/14/2014 7:54 PM, Kai wrote:
>> Andy,
>> No baloney! I urged and helped Ed write that FCC comment. The proposed
>> experiment is real..
>> If you want to discuss this, we should take it off the reflector.
>> 73
>> Kai, KE4PT
>>
>> On 3/14/2014 6:29 PM, aflowers at frontiernet.net wrote:
>>> (Honestly Kai, your baloney detector should have gone off instantly in even
>>> a cursory reading. You did read it, didn't you?)
>>>
>>> I decided not to reference this in my reply comments since these comments
>>> may have been done in ignorance (I have no idea who N4II is), but since Kai
>>> wants to hold it up as an example we ought to at least look closely.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list