[RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan

Jay WS7I ws7ik7tj at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 12:45:55 EDT 2014


Plenty of room.  For example.  14.000 - 14.035 CW more than enough.  
14.035 - 14.050 RTTY, 14.050-14.060 PSK31, 14.061 - 14.070 500 Hz.  
14.110-14.150 wideband.  RTTY just needs to move way down into the CW 
portion instead of the traditional crowd the top.  Same on 80 it only 
seems constrained. 3.525. - 3.545 new RTTY area.  Heck its really just 
how you look at things.  Can't wait until the 9600 baud packet stations 
get going!

I am tired of ALE dumping all over the high portion of the digital 
area.  After all CW is authorized anywhere in 14.000 - 14.350 let them 
move up and fight with the wideband automatic stuff which will really 
increase.


On 3/16/2014 9:29 AM, Anthony (N2KI) wrote:
> Wideband will definitely become an issue. We already are squeezing into the
> band plan as it is.  Unless the FCC plans on expanding the amateur
> frequency allocations beyond their current boundaries, there is no arena
> for wide band digital. There just isn't enough room.
>
> Anthony (N2KI)
>



More information about the RTTY mailing list