[RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan
Jay WS7I
ws7ik7tj at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 12:45:55 EDT 2014
Plenty of room. For example. 14.000 - 14.035 CW more than enough.
14.035 - 14.050 RTTY, 14.050-14.060 PSK31, 14.061 - 14.070 500 Hz.
14.110-14.150 wideband. RTTY just needs to move way down into the CW
portion instead of the traditional crowd the top. Same on 80 it only
seems constrained. 3.525. - 3.545 new RTTY area. Heck its really just
how you look at things. Can't wait until the 9600 baud packet stations
get going!
I am tired of ALE dumping all over the high portion of the digital
area. After all CW is authorized anywhere in 14.000 - 14.350 let them
move up and fight with the wideband automatic stuff which will really
increase.
On 3/16/2014 9:29 AM, Anthony (N2KI) wrote:
> Wideband will definitely become an issue. We already are squeezing into the
> band plan as it is. Unless the FCC plans on expanding the amateur
> frequency allocations beyond their current boundaries, there is no arena
> for wide band digital. There just isn't enough room.
>
> Anthony (N2KI)
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list