[RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status

[Terry]

And ID in CW, especially if they use a undocumented code.



-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich,
W4TV
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 5:44 PM
To: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts
and status


But even in the so called "automatic control" subbands *every* amateur
station is required to listen before they transmit.  Perhaps RM-11708 should
include a requirement that *any* digital station include a "channel busy"
detector that can not be defeated by the operator.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/17/2014 5:37 PM, John Becker wrote:
> Auto sub band was created to reduce QRM from the PACTOR ect mode so 
> called robots.
> The only problem was that others would wonder and then complain when 
> QRM'ed.
> To bad that all "will" not use that suggestion.
>
> Not a mailbox station but a user of pactor and other ARQ modes.
>
> John, W0JAB
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty