[RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 55

[iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato]

On 29/03/2014 23:41, rtty-request at contesting.com wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:40:58 -0400
> From: " Dave AA6YQ"<aa6yq at ambersoft.com>
> To: "'Terry'"<ab5k at hotmail.com>
> Cc:rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points
> Message-ID:<0e4301cf4b9f$f4c0c0f0$de4242d0$@ambersoft.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
> Re " The busy frequency detectors deployed by unattended digital stations are not effective."
>
> What leads you to this conclusion?
>
>         73,
>
>               Dave, AA6YQ

At least from this side quite all the day by day RTTY operations on 
several bands.
Out of books and out of setups make for those detectors. That's worst on 
40m and 30m.
The real world doesn't seems to take any advantage of the so called 
"Busy frequency detector".
May be those great things are more aimed to detect SETI signals than 
plain simple RTTY or CW signals.

            73 de iw1ayd Salvo