[RTTY] W1AW portables on JT65
W0MU Mike Fatchett
w0mu at w0mu.com
Wed May 28 23:50:11 EDT 2014
We just finished with Colorado. I would say it would depend on the band
and how many ops you have doing digital. I don't have our final
numbers but I could have worked lots more on RTTY. I personally made
over 3700 contacts on SSB, CW and RTTY. 1400 SSB, 1100 cw and the
rest RTTY. Approx.
AD1C pretty much took care of RTTY on 30m. 10/12 were pretty spotty
which was a real bummer.
If you like JT65 then go for it. Seems like plenty of people are using
that mode.
Mike W0MU
On 5/28/2014 9:25 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
> Since this is the "RTTY" reflector, I think I already know what kind of answers I'll get with this one, but here goes.
>
> I'm going to be operating W1AW/5 next week and will be doing a lot of RTTY. My thoughts are that I will not operate JT65 because of
> how slow it is. I have worked other W1AW portable stations on JT65 but I just don't see the value in using a mode that takes 5
> minutes to make one contact. Don't get me wrong, I really like JT65 and have over 1500 JT65 contacts in the log in the past 2 years.
> But...
>
> Is there any value at all to operating JT65 from W1AW portable operations? Does the rate get so slow toward the end that JT65 then
> becomes acceptable in spite of its slow rate?
>
> Thanks,
> Don AA5AU
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
More information about the RTTY
mailing list