[RTTY] RM-11708 on Oct 4th ARRL Exec Committee Adgenda

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

The commission has traditionally accepted comments in amateur matters
until Staff begins to prepare a draft notice for the Section Chief (in
the case of delegated authority) or the Commissioners review.  Amateur
issues have not been held to the strict 30/10 day standards nor has the
Commission been particularly quick to act on Amateur matters.

ARRL's last attempt to cram through PACTOR 4 (the poorly thought out
and explained "regulation by bandwidth") remained open for a couple
years with no action until ARRL pulled the proposal and began work on
what has become RM-11708.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 2014-10-02 7:55 PM, Phil Sussman wrote:
> I understand that has already been done. A few director comments last
> year reflected the view that late filings would of necessity have to
> be disregarded since the ARRL already had some assurance of that.
>
> On the other hand the RM remains in an 'open' status, thus allowing
> new comments to be accepted. Whether they will be considered by the
> FCC staff is another matter.
>
> 73 de Phil - N8PS
>
>
>
> Quoting Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm at wb2rhm.com>:
>
>> Joe,
>>
>> Bet you that the first thing the ARRL Exec Committee decides is to
>> have their legal team file/request that the FCC disregard any comment
>> on RM-11708 that was filed outside of the original 30-day comment
>> period............
>>
>> 73,
>> Ben - WB2RHM    _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>