[RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results

[Al Kozakiewicz]

I suspect it's an attempt at fostering accuracy. I do know that when I've done this contest (and others) where I'm just there to have a few hours of fun and make some QSO's, I'll just enter whatever I feel like for any part of an exchange that I didn't copy and that couldn't be deduced from something like the previous or following serial number.  But when I put a full effort in, that's another story.

A 3 or 4 digit random number might actually  accomplish this better as well as foil attempts to deduce a missing part of an exchange from other QSOs.

Al
AB2ZY
________________________________________
From: RTTY <rtty-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 9:53 AM
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results

------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:29:38 -0400, you wrote:

>I may not participate in this contest again unless the fairness and
>adjudication issues can be adequately resolved.
>
>Mike N1MD

REPLY:

One way to resolve them is to eliminate the time from the exchange and
replace it with something more interesting such as name or grid square
or year first licensed.

After all, who cares what time the other station thinks it is? A
complete waste of time (pun intended) IMO.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty