[RTTY] Question about NAQP rules

David VE3VID ve3vid at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 26 09:53:57 EST 2015


Maybe.  Its simply meant that we have to commit to the barefoot input of our favoured rig,  to a maximum of 100w.



You're right, how you get to 100w is not relivant. The rule says "no amp",  so no amps.  This is not an ethical problem.  Everyone will run 100w - unquestioned.  But, if my favoured rig is a 25yo Kenwood 850 in FSK,  and it can only muster 85w, then that's
 all I get.  If you bought a deluxe new rig, input 200 or 400w, great, invite me over to see it.  I bet you've got a tower to go with the rig.



...but you still dial it down to 100w.  We all commit to 1 rig.



73
David 













Sent from Samsung tablet






-------- Original message --------

From: Tom Osborne <w7why at frontier.com> 

Date: 24/02/2015 22:16 (GMT-05:00) 

To: rtty at contesting.com 

Subject: Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules 




FT-102 does about 175 watts with 3 6146's in the final.  73

Tom W7WHY





>

> On 2/24/2015 12:56 PM, Cheryl Whitlock wrote:

>> My old Drake TR4-C puts out 300 watts. (smile).

>> On Feb 24, 2015 11:55 AM, "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio at gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>>> Are there older transceivers (exciter alone) capable of more than 100 w

>>> output (no "external amplifier") for RTTY.  That okay? <smile>  73, de

>>> ric,

>>> wo4o



_______________________________________________

RTTY mailing list

RTTY at contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


 		 	   		  


More information about the RTTY mailing list