[RTTY] Question about NAQP rules
W0MU Mike Fatchett
w0mu at w0mu.com
Thu Feb 26 13:54:45 EST 2015
I guess the rule should state that you will be disqualified if you have
any type of amp located within 500m of your operating location and that
any rig possible of running over 100watts is not allowed.
Rules were made for the rule abiding. The cheaters don't care. Most
will never be caught.
Mike W0MU
On 2/26/2015 11:23 AM, Tom Osborne wrote:
> Now that is the silliest thing I have ever heard. Why would we run
> more that 100 watts - cause we're cheaters? Why italicize 'you'? Are
> you singling out Biil?? 73
> Tom W7WHY
>
> On 2/26/2015 8:31 AM, steve wrote:
>>
>>
>> IF "you" used the KW amp, "you" would be running more then 100w at
>> sometime...
>>
>> 73, steve WB3LGC
>>
>> On 26-Feb-15 10:48 AM, Bill Turner wrote:
>>> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>>>
>>>
>>> That is the "what" of the rule. The question is "why".
>>>
>>> As mentioned before, there are some ops who would prefer to run their
>>> transceivers at a low power level to reduce stress on it and use an
>>> amplifier to reach 100 watts.
>>>
>>> As I recall, many Yaesu transceivers are NOT rated for 100 watts on
>>> full duty cycle modes such as RTTY. Should these ops be forced to
>>> compete at reduced power? Or risk damaging their rigs in order to be
>>> competitive?
>>>
>>> This rule is silly and should be rescinded.
>>>
>>> Bill W6WRT
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
More information about the RTTY
mailing list