[RTTY] ARRL

[Mark n2qt]

Be sure to read the article Seven Seas Shack in Feb. QST.  for more on the use of WinLink.
in a way I thought, would garner support.  (As he was using it for aRRL bulletins and 
propagation reports).  

Mark. N2QT

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik at neb.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> Ed, Joe has answered most of your points pretty well but he missed a few
> 
>> On 3/1/2015 10:16 PM, Ed Karl wrote:
>> 
>> Lastly, divulge un- encrypting methods for select OO's to police the traffic so rendered.
>> There recently was congratulatory emails regarding possible rescue at sea thanks to
>> Winlink . No definite answer as to "was the station a ham?"
> Ed if you're referring to the Bounty incident for the rescue at sea that's mostly a lot of PR.
> The Coast Guard does not have an email address for sinking vessels and I'm quite sure
> if the boat was going down the last thing I would grab is the HF, modem, battery and laptop.
> 
> The OO's can't police the traffic now, I turned a case over to them and part of the reply was
> "we don't normally monitor those frequencies/modes". Why is the traffic hidden/encrypted to
> begin with? Makes it hard to self police like we're supposed to.
> 
> 73,
> Ron
> K0IDT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty