[RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence
Ron Kolarik
rkolarik at neb.rr.com
Sun Aug 14 15:30:12 EDT 2016
Yup, and the Canadians got a bit upset over the proposed ARRL band plan
because they use
or RTTY/Data sub band for SSB to get away from US stations. The other
problem is that Matthew
failed to recognize the Candians have a band plan that generally follows
Region 2.
<http://wp.rac.ca/rac-comments-on-arrl-proposed-changes-to-us-hf-band-plans/>
<http://www.rac.ca/rac-0-30-mhz-band-plan/>
Ron K0IDT
On 8/14/2016 10:00 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> On 8/14/2016 10:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
>> Also, a 500 Hz bandwidth limit would do little to reduce
>> interferencewhen Canada has a 6 kHz bandwidth limit.
>
> You're so far off base that you aren't even on the ball field.
>
> US licensees: 800,000 vs. Canadian licensees <70,000. At that
> ratio, giving each Canadian licensee 6 KHz is equivalent to
> giving each American 525 Hz.
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
More information about the RTTY
mailing list