[RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

[Schmidt-Eutingen]

Hi Neal,

just in case  i happen to work u somehow,

be sure I (87 years of age) am going to stick
to your proposal !

73 Heinz DK7UM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc at gmail.com>
To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat at outlook.com>
Cc: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers


> We could replace the 599 with RYRY to slow things down for the old
> timers....
> 
> 73
> 
> 
> Neal Campbell
> Abroham Neal LLC
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
>> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>>
>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:31:01 +0100, DK7UM wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Now seriously:  I always thought ham-radio to
>> >be a hobby. If miliseconds  count that much,
>> >is there still some enjoyment  left, to get in touch
>> >with friends?? May I doubt it!
>>
>> REPLY:
>>
>> It's not so much that milliseconds count (although they do) but that
>> sending 599 is pointless with RTTY. I can see some argument for
>> sending a signal report on CW or SSB because it sets the tone and
>> rhythm for what follows, but RTTY doesn't need that.
>>
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty