[RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 159, Issue 49

[Stanley Zawrotny]

We are going around again on the reason for the trailing CQ. It saves us from having to wait to see if the caller was calling someone or calling CQ. Anything to save us some time is good. 

If you want to argue about whether a space should be in a reply because it takes time in milliseconds, how can you argue about this that takes a lot of time?

Stan, K4SBZ

"Real radio bounces off the sky."

> On Mar 24, 2016, at 5:40 PM, rtty-request at contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
>    rtty at contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    rtty-request at contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    rtty-owner at contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: A Question for Chen... Soundcards? (Kok Chen)
>   2. Re: Dayton Hamvention RTTY Contest Forum (G3YYD)
>   3. Re: A Question for Chen... Soundcards? (Ed Muns)
>   4. Re: Trailing CQ (Mark n2qt)
>   5. Re: Trailing CQ (Peter Laws)
> <mime-attachment>
> <mime-attachment>
> <mime-attachment>
> <mime-attachment>
> <mime-attachment>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty