[RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

[G3YYD]

CRLF is not required just send CR or LF. The software will turn that into a new line. However I don’t care if a skimmer makes a false spot when I am running. It may even be beneficial if the guy who called me was a rare mult. Then people would come to the frequency and may then work a G station before moving on.

73 David G3YYD

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Sam Leslie - W4PK
Sent: 27 March 2016 18:36
To: 'Jeff AC0C'; rtty at contesting.com; 'Joe Subich, W4TV'
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

What about CR/LF after the CQ?

Sam Leslie
w4pk at arrl.net

Inch-by-inch life's a cinch, but yard-by-yard it is really hard



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff AC0C [mailto:keepwalking188 at ac0c.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 2:09 PM
To: rtty at contesting.com; Joe Subich, W4TV
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

The use of "DE" would be a mess, especially for the people living in DE.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- 
From: Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:51 PM
To: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum


> If CQ'ing stations want to put the letters CQ at the end of their
> CQ message, they should consider changing to "CQ{period}"  That is
> “CQ.”

CQ<period> requires *four characters* the same as TEST because of the
need to shift to FIGS for the period.  If you are going to use "CQ."
there is no advantage over TEST - it takes the same 330 ms longer than
CQ each time.

I'll leave it to the purists to argue whether 1 second for three CQs
is more effective than losing a QSO (or needing to call CQ again)
because someone tunes past and does not hear CQ ... or losing a run
frequency because someone does not hear CQ and assumes you are
leaving it.

The other solution is to put DE back in the CQ messages and trigger
CQ detection *only* when hearing CQ DE W1LID or QRZ DE W1LID, etc.
That will assure that those calls following  W1LID CQ without a
leading CR/LF do not trigger the CQ detection.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/27/2016 1:22 PM, Dave Hachadorian wrote:
> Alex, VE3NEA, is the guy who writes the Skimmer code.
>
> He has made two postings in this thread, which, if I understand them 
> correctly, are as follows:
> If CQ'ing stations want to put the letters CQ at the end of their CQ 
> message, they should consider changing to "CQ{period}"  That is “CQ.” 
> Alex says the program will ignore that three-character string.
>
> Stations who are S&P’ing should send a CR/LF before their call sign.  Alex 
> says that would be helpful.
>
> Alex is also working on other methods to improve the CQ/S&P uncertainty.
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Rinehart via RTTY
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 8:00 AM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum
>
> Ok - so don't use QRZ - got that - Test is too long -  got that too.  So, 
> if we don't use CQ and Test is too long, what is the alternative other 
> than just waiting for the Skimmer folks to figure it out?
> I don't use Skimmer myself but I can appreciate it's value.  Whether or 
> not a person uses Skimmer isn't the issue if I understand it right.  It's 
> this thing of Skimmer picking up CQ just in front of a S&P'ers callsign 
> and then posting that on the cluster as someone's Run frequency when 
> actually that callsign should only be associated with the S&P'er.  Am I 
> still confused?  or just Dense!  I Do want to operate correctly even 
> though I am just a Little Pistol providing contacts for the Big Boys!  I 
> am posting this because there are, no doubt, lots of others out there 
> reading this who are just too shy to say anything.  de W4PJW
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty