[RTTY] WAE RTTY and QTCs

[Don AA5AU]

Yes, my contest program of choice is WriteLog but W4AAW uses N1MM+ and I've been doing a lot of remote contesting at W4AAW.
N1MM+ is a very nice program. I personally think WriteLog is better overall for RTTY, but N1MM+ is pretty damn good too.
Don AA5AU

 
      From: Thom <ki8w at ki8w.com>
 To: rtty at contesting.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY and QTCs
   
Don,

So I take it your not a Writelog user?

To me N1MM looks too "cartoonish" for my tastes.

73

Thom KI8W



On 10/28/2016 03:45, Don AA5AU wrote:
> Larry's tutorial is excellent and how I learned to exchange QTCs with N1MM+.
> For WriteLog users, there's a tutorial on how to operate WAE with WriteLog here:
> http://www.rttycontesting.com/tutorials/writelog2/wae-rtty/
>
> 73, Don AA5AU
>
>  
>        From: Larry Gauthier (K8UT) <K8UT at charter.net>
>  To: rtty at contesting.com; Thom <ki8w at ki8w.com>
>  Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:51 AM
>  Subject: Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY and QTCs
>    
> Thom,
>
> Sending/Receiving QTCs can be a complicated for new RTTY contesters. If
> you're using N1MM Logger, you can find an instructional video for RTTY QTCs
> here:
>
> http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-index.php?page=Instructional+Videos
>
> -larry (K8UT)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thom
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:55 AM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] WAE RTTY and QTCs
>
> Well the WAE Contest is still a couple week away so I am leaving the
> door open for a possible participation.
>
> 73
>
> Thom KI8W
>
>
> On 10/27/2016 12:52, Dave Barr wrote:
>> I have been doing QTCs in the WAE for several years because it is fun and
>> it raises my score to one I'd never be able to achieve running QRP, as I
>> usually do.  I _always_ ask to receive QTCs, never to send, since my QRP
>> signal is usually too weak for reliable and reasonably quick transmission
>> of QTCs to another station.  I noticed in my log report for 2015 that I
>> had about a 7% error rate in receiving QTCs (which of course has nothing
>> to do with my running 5 watts).  Is this an unusually high error rate, or
>> is it simply that there is so much chance for undetectable errors in the
>> time (as long as its within sequence), call suffix and serial numbers
>> sent?
>>
>> Dave, K2YG
>>
>>
>>> Thom
>>> I hear you.
>>> May be blasphemous to say it, but you can participate without the QTC
>>> thing.
>>> Your score will be relatively low but still fun.
>>> I started doing the QTC thing last year at the urging of K2YG and once
>>> you set up the macros I found that it is not that difficult and makes it
>>> interesting.
>>> 73
>>> Al
>>> K2AL
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 9:44 PM, Thom <ki8w at ki8w.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I thought about running WAE RTTY but this QTC thing has me totally
>>>> confused.  Right now, with my current state of mind, I do not need more
>>>> complication in my RTTY operations.  Maybe next year.  Good luck in the
>>>> contest,  all.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>>
>>>> Thom KI8W
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>    
>  
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty