[RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Questions
    Larry 
    lknain at nc.rr.com
       
    Fri Sep 30 05:58:22 EDT 2016
    
    
  
Item III of the rules shows by example rst cqz state (state/province 
only for US/VE) but one might argue that the order is not mandated. Only 
the exchange elements are mandated. There were many variations sent 
(e.g., rst state cqz, rst cqz cqz state state, rst rst state state cqz 
cqz,....).  I suspect the variations are more about which element an 
operator remembers first or thinks is important.
If you use USOS (unshift on space) then the order probably doesn't 
matter because you will get the ltrs and figs characters anyway.
73, Larry  W6NWS
On 9/30/2016 1:32 AM, Jim Hooper wrote:
> Relatively new to RTTY … a little less than a year.
>
> A CW WW RTTY question: Why were some NA Stations sending 599 state zone, while I sent 599 zone state?   I would have thought that keeping the numbers together would be better for efficiency.
>
> 73,
> Hoop
> K9QJS
> San Juan Island, WA
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
    
    
More information about the RTTY
mailing list