[RTTY] One Pet Peeve

[Steve Bookout]

Really?

I operate by the 'norm', on a freq which I am currently 'borrowing', the 
other op is coming to me with his 'operating weirdness' and you're 
making me sound like the villain.

 From my perspective, its kinda like someone coming to your house, as a 
guest, and instead of behaving themselves to societal norms, they take a 
pee on your potted plant.
I guess I would be a rude host if I didn't take that in stride.

Steve

  On 7/14/2017 9:22:AM, Jim W7RY wrote:
> Wow Steve...
>
> I guess it is ALL ABOUT *YOU*.
>
> 73
> Jim W7RY
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Steve Bookout
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 8:11 AM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] One Pet Peeve
>
> All good comments.
>
> I try to be loud, but I guess we all do.  I think anyone with a bit of
> experience can tell if they're reasonably loud, or not.
> If I'm loud, I will send it ONCE.  If I change bands or conditions
> change, I will adjust accordingly.   It's not rocket science, if you do
> not copy what I send, ASK AGAIN.
>
> MY PET PEEVE.
>
> I don't care how loud either one of us is, when you call me, just send
> your call.   I DO NOT want your entire exchange.  I usually use ESM and
> am expecting things in a certain order.  I develop a rhythm when running
> and don't appreciate it being NEEDLESSLY disrupted, just to satisfy what
> you may thing are your special 'needs' or privileges.  It is *my*
> frequency till I relinquish it and we will play by my rules (which are
> not really difficult.)  Just use the normally accepted exchange format.
> It is a bit arrogant to expect anyone to make an exception based on
> self-centered, misguided needs of one individual.  I forgive the
> Italians, as this must be embedded in their DNA.   \
> *IF YOU DON'T LIKE THIS, DO NOT WORK ME* because I will not be anxious
> to work you.
>
> Steve, NR4M
>> Some RTTY operators insist on sending their exchange just once; for 
>> example, they send " David VA " once.Now if I had static crashes, 
>> QRM, QSB, etc, I may have missed their info and would have to ask for 
>> a repeat. If they had sent it twice then more than likely I would 
>> have copied enough of it that a repeat is unnecessary. I would ask 
>> all to send their info twice, so repeats are less likely. Doesn't 
>> that make sense? If not, tell me why not. That's my 2 cents worth.
>> 73, David AD4TJ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>