[SCCC] SCCC Digest, Vol 132, Issue 4
David Smith
w6te at msn.com
Mon Dec 9 12:31:22 EST 2013
Nice Job Jim!
Dave - W6TE
> From: sccc-request at contesting.com
> Subject: SCCC Digest, Vol 132, Issue 4
> To: sccc at contesting.com
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:00:05 -0500
>
> Send SCCC mailing list submissions to
> sccc at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sccc-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sccc-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SCCC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. ARRL 160 K6NR Single Op HP (Dana Roode)
> 2. CWops Tests WednesdayThursday (Hank Garretson)
> 3. TEN METER RTTY CONTEST (Dennis Younker NE6I)
> 4. ARRL 160 W4EF SOHP (Michael Tope)
> 5. Web Site (Jim Forsyth)
> 6. Fwd: ARRL 160 W6PH Single Op HP (Kurt Pauer)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 11:46:14 -0800
> From: Dana Roode <k6nr at arrl.net>
> To: SCCC Reflector <sccc at contesting.com>
> Subject: [SCCC] ARRL 160 K6NR Single Op HP
> Message-ID: <CE887DB8-7DC2-403A-86C6-9DA78BD6A6F8 at arrl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> ARRL 160-Meter Contest
>
> Call: K6NR
> Operator(s): K6NR
> Station: K6NR
>
> Class: Single Op HP
> QTH: org
> Operating Time (hrs): 11
> Remote Operation
>
> Summary:
> Total: QSOs = 425 Sections = 77 Countries = 9 Total Score = 78,518
>
> Club: Southern California Contest Club
>
> Comments:
>
> Band seemed pretty good Friday evening, strong signals and I got a few
> runs going. Saturday morning there were some strong signals from Japan.
> Saturday night conditions seemed poorer, with the exception of CS2C
> at my Sunset who sounded like a local and was easy to work. I didn't
> hear any other Eu. Sunday morning was very slow, with no JA heard.
>
> I worked the contest remotely from here in Irvine using my station near
> Victorville. I run a K3 and KPA500, about 500w, to an inverted L over 66
> radials.
>
> Thanks for the contacts everyone.
>
> Dana, K6NR
>
>
> Posted using 3830 Score Submittal Forms at: http://www.3830scores.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:28:42 -0800
> From: Hank Garretson <w6sx at arrl.net>
> To: SCCC <sccc at contesting.com>
> Subject: [SCCC] CWops Tests WednesdayThursday
> Message-ID:
> <CABD27U=neAWxwbnjsqbi6KQkSBuAxqZ8O25Wq-m54e5OMmiiqA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> CWops Tests this Wednesday at 1300Z and 1900Z and Thursday at 0300Z.
> Everyone welcome--you don't have to be a CWops member to join the fun.
>
> http://www.cwops.org/cwt.html
>
> Ten-meter rally 28.028 at 1930Z.
>
> I have changed CWops Test suggested frequencies from18 to 28 kHz up from
> band edges to *28 to 38 kHz up from band edges*, plus or minus as activity
> dictates. As always, please be particularly considerate of ongoing QSOs and
> DXpedition operations. Please slow down when called at a slower speed?we
> want everyone to feel welcome.
>
> Lots of Qs or just a few, please submit your results for each session at
> http://3830scores.com/ .
>
> And, mark your calendars--we will have CWTs on 25/26 December.
>
> I continue to record all my CWT QSOs over all three sessions. If you would
> like to hear your signal at W6SX, email me, and I'll send you short MP3
> files of our contacts.
>
>
>
> *The first rule of CW is to have fun and to share the fun. *CW Exuberantly,
>
> Hank, W6SX
>
> CWops Tests Manager
>
> Mammoth Lakes, California
>
> Elevation 8083 feet in John Muir's Range of Light
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:13:49 -0800
> From: "Dennis Younker NE6I" <ne6i at cox.net>
> To: "SCCC Reflector" <sccc at contesting.com>
> Subject: [SCCC] TEN METER RTTY CONTEST
> Message-ID: <B1DF0FB7C1E24764A0B70C28EFC2B633 at dennishome>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Call: NE6I
> Operator(s): NE6I
> Station: NE6I
>
> Class: Single Op LP
> Operating Time (hrs): 7.5
>
> Summary:
> Total: QSOs = 28 State/Prov = 14 Countries = 1 Total Score = 420
>
> Club: Southern California Contest Club
>
> Comments:
>
> My 2nd RTTY contest, both this weekend. However, my rig died while listening
> after an hour break. Argh. I swapped in the backup rig and was back up for
> the afternoon run.
> Also worked the 160M contest a bit the past two nights although I don't
> have a 160 antenna. Used the tuner to tune up what little I have, none of it
> very high. TNX go out to N6AA whom I called for about an hour before he
> finally copied me. I guess conditions had to be just right for my wet noodle
> to get through. Especially barefoot!
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:25:11 -0800
> From: Michael Tope <W4EF at dellroy.com>
> To: sccc at contesting.com
> Subject: [SCCC] ARRL 160 W4EF SOHP
> Message-ID: <52A52A07.4050804 at dellroy.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> CallSign Used : W4EF
> Operator(s) : W4EF
>
> Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
> Band : ALL
> Power : HIGH
> Mode : CW
>
>
> Band QSOs Pts Sec
> 1.8 40 80 21
> Total 40 80 21
>
>
> Score : 1,680
>
>
> I did a little S&P with my station in Littlerock via remote control from
> Tujunga. Rabbits chewed up my receive antenna feedlines, so all I had
> was the transmit antenna. The local man-made noise on 160 meters has
> gotten really bad up there at my Littlerock QTH to the point that I
> could hear better listening on my rig in Tujunga. So there would be no
> rules violation, I only did this as a test (I didn't use the Tujunga
> receiver to complete any contacts). It was interesting to hear
> difference between the two receive sites from selective fading.
>
> In any case, I really need to chase down that noise source. Topband used
> to be fun from up there. Now it is "hell on ears".
>
> 73, Mike W4EF..............
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:49:26 -0800
> From: Jim Forsyth <jim at af6o.com>
> To: sccc at contesting.com
> Subject: [SCCC] Web Site
> Message-ID: <52A5D876.2040409 at af6o.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I have posted an article about the JT5DX Contest Station on the web
> site: http://www.socalcontestclub.org/
>
> Jim, AF6O
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 08:20:05 -0800
> From: Kurt Pauer <w6ph73 at gmail.com>
> To: sccc at contesting.com
> Subject: [SCCC] Fwd: ARRL 160 W6PH Single Op HP
> Message-ID:
> <CAD9LaS1pBYjSoebGfrfD1Q9Xx4uMF68h+0mPh+oYhsLixKzs_g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> ARRL 160-Meter Contest
>
> Call: W6PH
> Operator(s): W6PH
> Station: W6PH
>
> Class: Single Op HP
> QTH: Lone Pine CA (ORG)
> Operating Time (hrs): 18
>
> Summary:
> Total: QSOs = 675 Sections = 78 Countries = 9 Total Score = 121,104
>
> Club: Southern California Contest Club
>
> Comments:
>
> IC-781 AL1200
> Antenna: 62 ft 1/4 wave sloper below 5 el 10m yagi with loading coil in the
> middle
> CT-DOS 9.57
>
> Missed NLI, MB, LB, PR.
>
> Conditions were better on Friday night than Saturday. Saturday was a
> struggle
> to find new stations and to work the east coast. I QRTed at midnight both
> nights after going 10 minutes without a new contact.
>
> I tried a new antenna this year and it seemed to work pretty well without
> having to resort to a field of radials in the limited space that I have.
>
> Looking forward to using that 10m yagi next weekend.
>
> 73, Kurt W6PH
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SCCC Digest, Vol 132, Issue 4
> ************************************
More information about the SCCC
mailing list