[SCCC] FW: Competitive Contest Comparison - Flex vs Elecraft
W6ph at aol.com
W6ph at aol.com
Thu Aug 24 09:47:00 EDT 2017
The other consideration is that the Flex needs software to operate. The
K3 does not need software. Working with software is always a frustration
for me. Something is always going wrong after an "upgrade", I do not like a
computer controlling my radio.
The forums are replete with people having problems integrating their
computers with their radios.
I will take my K3 and FTdx3000 any day over a Flex.
73, Kurt W6PH
In a message dated 8/23/2017 4:38:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bhorn at hornucopia.com writes:
Hi,
I think the problem with the author's attempt to make an apples-to-apples
comparison of the two transceivers is that he attempted to configure each
so that it had all of the features/functionality (as near as possible) of
the other. A better approach would be to define the functionality/performance
needed (in this case for contesting since this is a contest club e-mail
reflector) and then determine how and at what cost each rig could meet those
requirements. Even then an important question would be whether the
contester wants remote operation.
I own a K3 that has the available K3S upgrades (a K3+ ?) and think the new
Flex transceivers are certainly worth considering.
73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
More information about the SCCC
mailing list