From paul@ei5di.com Tue Jan 1 21:10:26 2002
From: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:10:26 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] V9.84 Released.
References: <001901c11e9b$5176f840$e5a5fea9@dell>
Message-ID: <003e01c19308$bd200be0$e5a5fea9@dell>
Version 9.84 1 January 2002
SD - Type 10, RAC Contest.
Non-Canadian QSOs could not be edited, because SD
insisted on getting a Province. Fixed.
SDV - Serial Sent.
Separate serials are required, by band, in most
RSGB contests, and this has been standard in SDV.
However, the RSGB Cumulatives require a combined
serial, regardless of band. You now have the
choice of either of these options at startup.
SDV - Own Locator.
In all contests, your own locator is displayed
under the QSO Time field - useful for guest or
multi-op events.
PTT ON:
The variable delay between switching and keying
was broken - fixed. The default delay is 40 ms.
It can be set to any value between 0 and 999 ms
by editing the SD_PTTDELAY parameter in
SDCONFIG.TXT.
Auto CW - not disabled after F1.
Please refer to the release notes for V9.82. Auto
CW was disabled when playing keyer memories from
the Function Keys (F1 to F8). F1 (normally the CQ
message) no longer disables Auto CW.
Country Multiplier Files (*.CTY).
Updated as per AD1C's release notes in October.
JAPAN.MLT updated.
SDCHECK - Mixed Mode Summary Sheet.
The separate counts of CW and SSB QSOs included
dupes. Fixed.
In Type 10 contests, the .LOG file now includes
any non-numeric data in the Serial Received field.
Esc - all programs.
In V9.78, I introduced the message "Esc to restore
xxxx" where xxxx represents the field you've just
wiped. I think it's better removed.
________________________________________________________
The programs may be downloaded from http://www.ei5di.com
Please let me know what you'd like to see in the next update.
Keep copies of the programs you're using now - as insurance!
73, and Happy New Year
Paul EI5DI
From paul.bigwood@kbcomms.demon.co.uk Sat Jan 5 16:05:17 2002
From: paul.bigwood@kbcomms.demon.co.uk (Paul Bigwood)
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:05:17 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] Yaesu FT-1000MP Mk5 anyone?
Message-ID: <000b01c19602$c55a1240$0c3d989e@g3wyw.net>
Hi All,
HNY to all on the list.
I'm having some trouble with getting MP MK5 to talk to SD. I can see the
CAT light on the radio flash regularily but no band or mode
appears on the SD screen. Changing band on the radio is not reflected in
the program, nor does the radio follow the computer.
My Computer is a Pentium 150, Win98, 64MB Ram, huge disk ! It all works fine
for TurboLog but not SD.
Does anyone have a FT1KMP5.SD file. I've tried the FT1000 and FT1000MP files
but neither work.
TIA de Paul G3WYW
remove the spamno to reply!
mailto: g3wyw@kbcomms.spamno.demon.co.uk
From mike@thorogood13.freeserve.co.uk Tue Jan 15 17:58:27 2002
From: mike@thorogood13.freeserve.co.uk (Mike Thorogood)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:58:27 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] WINDOWS ME
Message-ID: <000001c19dee$e157f5e0$22e2193e@thorogood>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C19DEE.3BF258C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SD Vs.9.84 runs ok on my PC using Windows ME (upgraded from Windows 98)
I did a "dummy-run" on RO PO CO and all was well, including the cw =
keyer.
I havn`t made the suggested boot disc yet but may do so if probs. do =
arise.
73 de mike, gm0jkf.
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C19DEE.3BF258C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SD Vs.9.84 runs ok on my PC using Windows ME =
(upgraded from=20
Windows 98)
I did a "dummy-run" on RO PO CO and all was well, =
including=20
the cw keyer.
I havn`t made the suggested boot disc yet but =
may do so=20
if probs. do arise.
73 de mike, gm0jkf.
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C19DEE.3BF258C0--
From yb2erl@idola.net.id Wed Jan 16 11:29:59 2002
From: yb2erl@idola.net.id (BAMBANG SURYO WIDODO)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:29:59 +0700
Subject: [SD-User] SD VER 9.84
Message-ID: <000e01c19e81$2320b380$ab0998ca@yb2erl>
Where is the new Version of SD , I check on the web it still same the
9.83 version on that web.
Tnx de Bambang,YB2ERL
From PA9TT.Dan@12move.nl Wed Jan 16 14:26:16 2002
From: PA9TT.Dan@12move.nl (D. van Dalen, PA9TT)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:26:16 +0100
Subject: [SD-User] SD-9.84
Message-ID: <001d01c19e99$f11ed880$acb2f1c3@daandale>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C19EA2.24549CA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DR OM Bambang , YB2ERL,=20
please "refresh" your homepage, and you will see that its going to =
change !
i have already downloaded it and it works fb.
ps: it is the icon between start and stop=20
73 to you all, de PA9TT - Dan.
------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C19EA2.24549CA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DR OM Bambang , YB2ERL,
please "refresh" your homepage, and you =
will see=20
that its going to change !
i have already downloaded it and it =
works=20
fb.
ps: it is the icon between start and=20
stop
73 to you all, de PA9TT - =
Dan.
------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C19EA2.24549CA0--
From Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk Wed Jan 16 18:56:21 2002
From: Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk (Richard W L Limebear)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:56:21 GMT
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
Message-ID: <33172@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
Greetings
Has anyone experienced speed changes while SD is transmitting ?
The symptom, which occurred during the British AFS contest a couple of
weeks ago, showed up like this:
SD sending an exchange at normal speed, suddenly slows down, speeds up,
slows down, speeds up etc. Speed was set at about 28wpm and dropped to
(guess) about 15wpm just like hitting the speed control on an el-bug whilst
sending.
System: SD 9.84 in a maximised DOS window on a W98 laptop. Happened twice
during the 4-hour contest after, say, about 90 minutes of operating; didn't
have time to go into diagnostics, just rebooted and restarted.
73
Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
g3rwl@amsat.org
FOC # 1188
From fistman@ntlworld.com Wed Jan 16 08:17:48 2002
From: fistman@ntlworld.com (John Ball)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:17:48 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
References: <33172@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <000601c19e66$68acea60$e7edff3e@fistman>
Hi Richard, yes I had the same thing myself, have had it before as well, but
usually leave it and send by hand and when I go back it seems to have
cleared itself don't know how, or why. Mine about the same time scale as
well, after about an hour.
John de g4oos.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard W L Limebear"
To:
Sent: 16 January 2002 18:56
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
> Greetings
>
> Has anyone experienced speed changes while SD is transmitting ?
>
> The symptom, which occurred during the British AFS contest a couple of
> weeks ago, showed up like this:
>
> SD sending an exchange at normal speed, suddenly slows down, speeds up,
> slows down, speeds up etc. Speed was set at about 28wpm and dropped to
> (guess) about 15wpm just like hitting the speed control on an el-bug
whilst
> sending.
>
> System: SD 9.84 in a maximised DOS window on a W98 laptop. Happened twice
> during the 4-hour contest after, say, about 90 minutes of operating;
didn't
> have time to go into diagnostics, just rebooted and restarted.
>
> 73
> Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
> g3rwl@amsat.org
> FOC # 1188
> _______________________________________________
> SD-User mailing list
> SD-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
From lee@g0mtn.freeserve.co.uk Wed Jan 16 20:20:30 2002
From: lee@g0mtn.freeserve.co.uk (Lee Volante)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:20:30 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
References: <33172@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <00e301c19ecb$3f9d2ee0$40b5193e@g0mtnpc>
Hi Richard,
Exactly the same happened here also after about 90 minutes, and then cleared
about 30 minutes later but not completely. I can't replicate it from
scratch - perhaps I need to have a few QSOs logged ?
Running SD9.83 on a P300 laptop in Win95. Also happened during AFS last
year running whatever version of SD was then in fashion.
Last year's config was set to not to boot to Win95 at all (set bootgui to 0
in msdos.sys) and at the time I thought it may have been to do with SMARTDRV
(or lack thereof.)
This year it happened again running SD full screen within Windows 95.
Changing from full screen, and exiting and restarting SD did not fix it. I
was loathe to shut down and restart the whole PC so lived with it.
Maybe it's just laptops - my home desktop never glitches :-)
Typing and using a paddle at the same time is not fun ! Apologies to
everyone who came across my poor CW during the test.
Lee G0MTN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard W L Limebear"
To:
Sent: 16 January 2002 18:56
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
> Greetings
>
> Has anyone experienced speed changes while SD is transmitting ?
>
> The symptom, which occurred during the British AFS contest a couple of
> weeks ago, showed up like this:
>
> SD sending an exchange at normal speed, suddenly slows down, speeds up,
> slows down, speeds up etc. Speed was set at about 28wpm and dropped to
> (guess) about 15wpm just like hitting the speed control on an el-bug
whilst
> sending.
>
From p.brice-stevens@zeiss.co.uk Thu Jan 17 08:43:39 2002
From: p.brice-stevens@zeiss.co.uk (p.brice-stevens@zeiss.co.uk)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 8:43:39 +0000
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
Message-ID:
Hi all,
I thought this was a problem associated with running SD in a MS-DOS window rather than from a 'proper' DOS at the command prompt...I was under the impression that if you do run SD in the windows DOS box there are occasions when windows decides it could be doing something else with its resources and whizz's off to do a routine thus effecting the cW speed...I have never found this trouble when running from DOS prompt (start/shutdown/restart in DOS/cd to the SD directory and away you go)...remembering to run the calibrate command before getting going as well.
I'm sure I have seen this with problem other brands as well when running them in a windows MS-DOS box, thus suggesting it is a windows rather than SD problem....I think!
Hope this helps someone.
73
Paul
G0WAT
From John Clayton Wed Jan 16 22:22:14 2002
From: John Clayton (John Clayton)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:22:14 +0000
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
In-Reply-To: <00e301c19ecb$3f9d2ee0$40b5193e@g0mtnpc>
References: <33172@g3rwl.demon.co.uk> <00e301c19ecb$3f9d2ee0$40b5193e@g0mtnpc>
Message-ID:
Hi folks.
I used SD 9.84 in AFS - but in DOS (ie rebooted Win98 into DOS mode) and
it worked fine. No variations at all.
Cheers for now de John, G4PDQ.
From phil.catterall"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C19F38.17F10160
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My PC crashed twice in AFS whilst entering calls into SD, so had to =
reboot.
However, I did not notice any speed variation in SD 9.84 at all. I was =
running in a window within Windows 95=20
keying on Com 4. The PC is P166.
73 Phil Catterall
G4OBK =20
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C19F38.17F10160
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My PC crashed twice in AFS whilst entering calls =
into SD,=20
so had to reboot.
However, I did not notice any speed variation in =
SD 9.84=20
at all. I was running in a window within Windows 95
keying on Com 4. The PC is P166.
73 Phil Catterall
G4OBK
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C19F38.17F10160--
From John's LineOne"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C19F8A.DDA277C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I used it also last w/e in DOS NOT in windows and had no probelem with =
the keying speed, I have only ever had that when using with ut running =
with windows in the background
John G4RCG
This email has been virus scanned scanned by NORTON 2002 prior to being =
sent to you
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C19F8A.DDA277C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I used it also last w/e =
in DOS NOT in=20
windows and had no probelem with the keying speed, I have only ever had =
that=20
when using with ut running with windows in the background
John G4RCG
This email has been =
virus scanned=20
scanned by NORTON 2002 prior to being sent to =
you
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C19F8A.DDA277C0--
From paul.bigwood@kbcomms.demon.co.uk Wed Jan 16 22:51:23 2002
From: paul.bigwood@kbcomms.demon.co.uk (Paul Bigwood)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:51:23 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
References: <33172@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <000001c19f93$d449cda0$0c3d989e@g3wyw.net>
Hi Richard,
Exactly the same thing happened to me when setting up for AFS last weekend.
Shack computer is a Pentium 100 running Win98.
First press of the F1 key CQ came out first at normal speed then slowed down
and increased up again. I ran calibrate which seemed to fix it for a while
then it started again.
It was then that I realised that I was running in a DOS box under Win98.
Rebooted PC to DOS and it never happened again. I think its something to do
with Win98 not allowing SD ( or any DOS program for that matter) to have
access / control of the serial ports, and if Windows decides to go off and
service some interupt while key is down, then CW gets slowed up.
Ran SD in DOS mode for the duration and no problems. Score wasn't brilliant
but thats me not
SD!
YMMV
73s de Paul G3WYW mailto: g3wyw@kbcomms.demon.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard W L Limebear"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:56 PM
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
> Greetings
>
> Has anyone experienced speed changes while SD is transmitting ?
>
> The symptom, which occurred during the British AFS contest a couple of
> weeks ago, showed up like this:
>
> SD sending an exchange at normal speed, suddenly slows down, speeds up,
> slows down, speeds up etc. Speed was set at about 28wpm and dropped to
> (guess) about 15wpm just like hitting the speed control on an el-bug
whilst
> sending.
>
> System: SD 9.84 in a maximised DOS window on a W98 laptop. Happened twice
> during the 4-hour contest after, say, about 90 minutes of operating;
didn't
> have time to go into diagnostics, just rebooted and restarted.
>
> 73
> Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
> g3rwl@amsat.org
> FOC # 1188
> _______________________________________________
> SD-User mailing list
> SD-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
From lesel"
Hi All,
Booting into DOS does not seem
to work everytime, especially if using WIN 98. A
fellow club mate, and myself cured a similar
problem by the following:-
Create a new shortcut to MS-DOS on the Desktop,
rename to 'SD'
(To do this, click 'Start' 'Programs', right-click
the MS-DOS shortcut, and click 'create new
shortcut', then drag this shortcut to the Desktop.
Rename by highlighting with single click then
press F2, or single click again after a short
pause.)
Right click the new Icon, click 'Properties',
Select the 'program' tab, amend 'Working' line to
read C:\SD. (or the name of the folder that you
have SD files in) then click 'Advanced'
Tick 'MS-DOS' box
Select 'Specify a new MS-DOS config.sys for MS-DOS
mode.'
Click in Config.sys box and add the lines:-
Device=C:\WINDOWS\Himem.sys
Device=C:\WINDOWS\EMM386.exe RAM
Note the full stops, and space between 'exe &
'RAM'
Click 'OK' twice.
When you double-click the new Icon, the computer
will close down and restart in MS-DOS mode. To
get back to Windows, type 'exit' at the DOS
prompt.
Between 'SD' sessions, simply switch off with the
power switch, it will restart in DOS.
73
GL
Les, G4OGB
From Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk Sun Jan 20 16:50:13 2002
From: Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk (Richard W L Limebear)
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:50:13 GMT
Subject: [SD-User] CW speed variations
Message-ID: <33302@g3rwl.demon.co.uk>
Gang
Many thanks for all the responses to the problem.
A few replies came in off-list. Anyone who wants to see them all please
let me know and I'll send a copy. They all talked about the same solution
though.
73
Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
g3rwl@amsat.org
FOC # 1188
So many beautiful girls ..... (sob) so little time
From paul@ei5di.com Sun Jan 20 18:22:07 2002
From: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:22:07 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] RSGB Jubilee Contest
Message-ID: <005e01c1a1df$88b92ae0$e5a5fea9@dell>
SDJ - RSGB Jubilee Contest 2002.
I've released SDJ (SD for the Jubilee contest) as a
freeware contest logger. It's derived from SD Type 9
(General, Country Multipliers), and is intended for
this event only.
SDJCHECK is the corresponding post-contest program
to prepare your Log and Summary Sheet to RSGB
specifications. It includes ADIF and text export
options to let you integrate your contest log with
your station log. You can download SDJ from
http://www.ei5di.com, or directly from
http://www.ei5di.com/sd/sdj984.zip (285 kb).
SDJ will be updated and supported (and operational)
for 2002 only. Registered SD Users should use SD,
rather than SDJ, for the Jubilee Contest, because
the files created by SD and SDJ are not fully
compatible. If you already have SD and would like
to try SDJ, you must install it in a separate folder
or directory.
When SDJ is run for the first time, it creates a file
called SDCONFIG.TXT. Users outside the Commonwealth
areas should add their (6 character) Locator code to
the SD_LCTR record in this file, as otherwise SDJ
will not display bearing and distance to each
Commonwealth area.
SDCHECK - Summary Sheet.
The Valid QSO totals counted dupes twice. Fixed.
I've incorporated this version of SDCHECK in SD984
on the website. You can get SDCHECK alone from
http://www.ei5di.com/sd/sdcheck.zip. You should use
this for your RSGB AFS Summary Sheet.
73,
Paul EI5DI
From ly3cy@yahoo.com Tue Jan 29 11:20:18 2002
From: ly3cy@yahoo.com (Romualdas Ulevicius)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 03:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [SD-User] SDU - Frequency errors in ADIF and TEXT export files
Message-ID: <20020129112018.96921.qmail@web10103.mail.yahoo.com>
Be careful using SDU ADIF and TEXT format export files
after UBA contest. It is related with wrong frequency
for 10 meters band. Here is an extraction from my UBA
contest log in TXT format, just the same in ADI:
"SSB"#"10"#"28.000"#"EI5GI"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1305"#"59"#"59"#"012"#001"#"
*"
"SSB"#"10"#"30.640"#"IZ8DEP"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1308"#"59"#"59"#"002"#002"#"
*"
"SSB"#"10"#"29.619"#"RW4WR"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1309"#"59"#"59"#"008"#003"#"
*"
"SSB"#"10"#"29.607"#"UA4WI"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1310"#"59"#"59"#"006"#004"#"
*"
"SSB"#"10"#"29.703"#"UA4WLI"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1316"#"59"#"59"#"009"#005"#"
*"
"SSB"#"10"#"28.000"#"G4LEA"#"2002"#"01"#"26"#"1317"#"59"#"59"#"001"#006"#"
*"
30.640, 29.619, 29.607 .... are errors. The highest frequency
used in contest was only about 28.530. Seems that all 10m
must be converted to 28.000. SDU ver.9.84 was used.
Romas LY3CY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
From berger@cyc.ucl.ac.be Tue Jan 29 11:39:28 2002
From: berger@cyc.ucl.ac.be (Guy Berger (ON7ZV))
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:39:28 +0100
Subject: [SD-User] re: SDU - Frequency errors in ADIF and TEXT export files
Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.2.20020129123729.03cc6590@pop.fynu.ucl.ac.be>
Hi all,
On our side (UBA) we prefer to have the initial .all format, our log
checker uses that structure.
Best 73 de Guy
**************************************************************
BERGER Guy * Radio amateur call sign: ON7ZV
Brussels DX Team member
One of the Contest Committee gang
Cyclotron Research Center
Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve
Chemin du cyclotron, 2
1348 Louvain la Neuve - Belgium
Phone:+32/(0)10 47 32 25 Fax:+32/(0)10 45 21 83
E-Mail: BERGER@cyc.ucl.ac.be
http://www.cyc.ucl.ac.be/
**************************************************************
From ur5ffc@odessa.net Tue Jan 29 20:07:43 2002
From: ur5ffc@odessa.net (Kostiantyn Popandopoulo)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:07:43 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] (no subject)
Message-ID: <200201292212.g0TMCKE80297@Tele.TM.Odessa.UA>
Hello!
Emegine such situation...
You run SD, creare the contest name, got next window for continue
and find this contest name is incorrect.
How you can correct contest name without rebooting your computer?
73! de Kosta UR5FFC
From paul@ei5di.com Tue Jan 29 23:22:53 2002
From: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:22:53 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] (no subject)
References: <200201292212.g0TMCKE80297@Tele.TM.Odessa.UA>
Message-ID: <003a01c1a91b$e1bc26e0$e5a5fea9@dell>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kostiantyn Popandopoulo"
> You run SD, creare the contest name, got next window for
continue
> and find this contest name is incorrect.
> How you can correct contest name without rebooting your
computer?
You can leave SD, and get back to DOS, where you see "Callsign or
END" by entering END or QUIT.
Alternatively, you can continue to the normal logging screen and
enter END or QUIT in the callsign field.
Then you must delete NAME.ALL where NAME is the incorrect contest
name - and then start SD again.
73,
Paul EI5DI
From paul@ei5di.com Wed Jan 30 00:04:01 2002
From: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:04:01 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] SDU - Frequency errors in ADIF and TEXT export files
References: <20020129112018.96921.qmail@web10103.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <007001c1a921$a023cc00$e5a5fea9@dell>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Romualdas Ulevicius"
> Be careful using SDU ADIF and TEXT format export files
> after UBA contest. It is related with wrong frequency
> for 10 meters band.
Many thanks for the bug report. The problem was in SDCHECK, and
affected the UBA contest only. You can download a fixed version
of SDCHECK from http://www.ei5di.com/sd/sdcheck.zip (77 kb).
73,
Paul EI5DI
From sd-user@g3nks.demon.co.uk Wed Jan 30 07:37:25 2002
From: sd-user@g3nks.demon.co.uk (Derek Thom)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:37:25 +0000
Subject: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
In-Reply-To: <005e01c1a1df$88b92ae0$e5a5fea9@dell>
References: <005e01c1a1df$88b92ae0$e5a5fea9@dell>
Message-ID:
This year during AFS I made several duplicate QSOs in both the CW and
SSB legs. When I came to look at the Summary Sheet (produced by SD
Check) I notice that the number of valid QSOs was in error.
Eg On SSB I had 241 total QSOs including 7 dupes. So the number of
valid QSOs was 234. However the summary sheet showed 227. A similar
discrepancy occurred with the CW Summary Sheet. It looked as though
SDCHECK was deducting twice the number of dupes from the grand total of
QSOs.
Anyone else notice this apparent anomaly?
Regards,
Derek G3NKS
--
Derek Thom
G3NKS
Cheltenham
From paul@ei5di.com Wed Jan 30 08:26:39 2002
From: paul@ei5di.com (Paul O'Kane)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:26:39 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
References: <005e01c1a1df$88b92ae0$e5a5fea9@dell>
Message-ID: <001b01c1a967$d8002ba0$e5a5fea9@dell>
Derek G3NKS said
> This year during AFS I made several duplicate QSOs in both the
CW and
> SSB legs. When I came to look at the Summary Sheet (produced by
SD
> Check) I notice that the number of valid QSOs was in error.
This bug has been fixed - here's a copy of the notice (20th
January).
SDCHECK - Summary Sheet.
The Valid QSO totals counted dupes twice. Fixed.
I've incorporated this version of SDCHECK in SD984
on the website. You can get SDCHECK alone from
http://www.ei5di.com/sd/sdcheck.zip. You should use
this for your RSGB AFS Summary Sheet.
73,
Paul EI5DI
From g0dvj@amsat.org Wed Jan 30 21:56:31 2002
From: g0dvj@amsat.org (Jonathan G0DVJ)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:56:31 +0000
Subject: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <382B05F4-15CC-11D6-8601-000393646AFA@amsat.org>
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 07:37 am, Derek Thom wrote:
>
> This year during AFS I made several duplicate QSOs in both the CW and
> SSB legs. When I came to look at the Summary Sheet (produced by SD
> Check) I notice that the number of valid QSOs was in error.
>
> Anyone else notice this apparent anomaly?
>
Yes I did too.
73,
Jonathan G0DVJ
--
From G3VAO@hortonbrook.freeserve.co.uk Wed Jan 30 22:13:55 2002
From: G3VAO@hortonbrook.freeserve.co.uk (Mike Farmer)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:13:55 -0000
Subject: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
References: <382B05F4-15CC-11D6-8601-000393646AFA@amsat.org>
Message-ID: <001601c1a9db$696d7e80$d0c986d9@hbc>
Paul solved this one on 20 Jan and put a msg saying so on this group
you need to download a new version of SC Check.
73 de Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan G0DVJ"
To: "Derek Thom"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
>
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 07:37 am, Derek Thom wrote:
>
> >
> > This year during AFS I made several duplicate QSOs in both the CW and
> > SSB legs. When I came to look at the Summary Sheet (produced by SD
> > Check) I notice that the number of valid QSOs was in error.
> >
> > Anyone else notice this apparent anomaly?
> >
> Yes I did too.
>
> 73,
>
> Jonathan G0DVJ
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> SD-User mailing list
> SD-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
>
From sd-user@g3nks.demon.co.uk Wed Jan 30 19:39:46 2002
From: sd-user@g3nks.demon.co.uk (Derek Thom)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:39:46 +0000
Subject: [SD-User] SD - QSO totals on summary sheet
In-Reply-To: <001b01c1a967$d8002ba0$e5a5fea9@dell>
References: <005e01c1a1df$88b92ae0$e5a5fea9@dell>
<001b01c1a967$d8002ba0$e5a5fea9@dell>
Message-ID:
Paul O'Kane wrote:
>Derek G3NKS said
>
>> This year during AFS I made several duplicate QSOs in both the
>CW and
>> SSB legs. When I came to look at the Summary Sheet (produced by
>SD
>> Check) I notice that the number of valid QSOs was in error.
>
>This bug has been fixed - here's a copy of the notice (20th
>January).
>
>SDCHECK - Summary Sheet.
> The Valid QSO totals counted dupes twice. Fixed.
> I've incorporated this version of SDCHECK in SD984
> on the website. You can get SDCHECK alone from
> http://www.ei5di.com/sd/sdcheck.zip. You should use
> this for your RSGB AFS Summary Sheet.
>
Paul,
Very many thanks, and apologies for troubling you. I thought I was
using the latest version - but clearly not.
I don't know why some bother with other contest loggers - in my
experience there is nothing which beats SD!
Best regards,
Derek G3NKS
--
Derek Thom
G3NKS
Cheltenham
From jateva@teleline.es Thu Jan 31 22:09:33 2002
From: jateva@teleline.es (Juan Antonio Teva =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=F3rdoba?=)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:09:33 +0100
Subject: [SD-User] [Fwd: Bugs in SD 9.84]
Message-ID: <3C59C09D.A72F32EE@teleline.es>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------02E743E9C7F3341B52EC4237
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--------------02E743E9C7F3341B52EC4237
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <3C559D2D.594C3312@teleline.es>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:49:18 +0100
From: Juan Antonio Teva =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=F3rdoba?=
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sd-user@contesting.com"
CC: Paul O'Kane
Subject: Bugs in SD 9.84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear OMīs , last weekend I participed in REF contest cw with SD 9.84.
When worked the same call but in other band, SD showed on the upper
right corner the dep info about log call. Some times this dep info
showed was not the same that call logged, otherwise showed info about
call before logged.
Somebody observed it?
PD.: SD run great job.
73 de ea7akj.
--------------02E743E9C7F3341B52EC4237--
From jateva@teleline.es Thu Jan 31 22:30:56 2002
From: jateva@teleline.es (Juan Antonio Teva =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=F3rdoba?=)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:30:56 +0100
Subject: [SD-User] Test
Message-ID: <3C59C59F.D9D5C03D@teleline.es>
Only test