[SD-User] Club Calls setup ?
Richard W L Limebear
Richard at g3rwl.demon.co.uk
Mon Nov 10 18:42:59 EST 2003
"Paul O'Kane" writes:
> > > > SD permits a maximum of 11 characters -
> > I'm amazed that a longer field length is not possible.
> It is possible, but it introduces QSO capacity issues
> and various other compromises.
If its just related to memory size (how many people only have just 600k of
spare memory ?) I wouldn't think of it as an issue. Nor do I see any need for
this field to be checked against other fields. Another possible factor is that,
in the club calls contest, more than 200 QSOs is highly unlikely.
> > .... see RSGB HFCC website - includes examples for CCC
> > in Cabrillo format.
>
> There are some inconsistencies in the example shown.
>
> 1. The indicated length for received club names is 26
> characters - not nearly enough for "Loughton and
> Epping Forest Amateur Radio Rociety".
In another document (RSGB Log File Format) they say this field is characters
73-128 and the line must then be terminated with a hard carriage return.
> 2. The "ARS" abbreviation is shown - is this permitted under the rules?
Good point, rules are not clear on this !!!
> 3. There is no provision for recording your own club name as sent.
Its in the header of their example file.
G3SEK writes:
> Full club name: "Vale of White Horse Amateur Radio Society without a 'the'"
Ouch. Personally I'm checking club names against the RSGB Yearbook.
G3SVD writes:
> Surely the best solution is to give each club a registration number or code
> (like district codes in other contests) of just two or three characters,
> unless the object is to copy long club names correctly. In which case points
> should be lost for each error, e.g putting "the" into Vale of White Horse
> Amateur Radio Society.
Good idea and good point but ...
G3VAO writes:
> Why not use the Clubs RSGB membership number which if memory serves me
> correctly is on the RadCom address label.
This number is also their password to the RSGB members-only website - probably
a security issue here.
Since I'm not the only person complaining about this, may I suggest that
entrants have a moan in their "soapbox" comments - at least ARC, CG, RC etc
should be declared to be legal. HFCC would probably be glad to have the input.
73
Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
g3rwl at amsat.org
FOC # 1188
So many beautiful girls ..... (sob) so little time
More information about the SD-User
mailing list