[SD-User] SD-User Digest, Vol 146, Issue 5

[Gerard F6EEQ]

Thanks for advice Paul,I didn't notice this SETDUPE command.
If I understand correctly the manual, I have to use SETDUPE at the start 
of the second period, correct?

Concerning LM you're right: I rerun SDCHECK with ASCII file, and it was 
OK... but my log was already submitted!


73 de Gerard, F6EEQ
UFT 270, REF 27177, RCWC 257

Le 23/02/2015 18:00, sd-user-request at contesting.com a écrit :
> Send SD-User mailing list submissions to
> 	sd-user at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	sd-user-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	sd-user-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SD-User digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. HSC contest (Gerard F6EEQ)
>     2. Re: HSC contest (Paul O'Kane)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:01:32 +0100
> From: Gerard F6EEQ <f6eeq at UFT.NET>
> To: sd-user at contesting.com
> Subject: [SD-User] HSC contest
> Message-ID: <54EAEC6C.3050407 at UFT.NET>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I used SD in last HSC contest and this was very enjoyable, although I
> got problem of rig link disconnection, but this was not due to SD but to
> HF pick-up, probably by the screen.
>
> I have one remark:
> Each station may be contacted during the first period *_and _*during the
> second period, as far as I understood from the rules, and at least no
> station warned me QSO BFR!
> During the second period, SD warned me of DUPE. So I disregarded this.
> At the beginning of 2nd period it's easy to know that it is not a real
> DUPE, but, after a while, you must search through the log to be sure.
>
> Would it be possible, for the next run in October to correct this?
>
>
> Another remark, but also probably not due to SD:
> HSC recommend to make reports with LM. I've been unable to export the
> Cabrillo file (.LOG) to LM, apparently because of column alignments
> which are not compatible. This gave 100% of calls not correct as well as
> the reports!
> Finally I sent directly the .LOG file!
>
> Thanks for your nice job.
>