[SECC] Re: W4 QSO Party ?

[Bill Coleman]

On 7/27/01 3:48 PM, Ed at k4sb@mindspring.com wrote:

>I think the idea of multiple States in one party would just be a
>little too much, especially if the rules were not exactly the same.

A general accord between the times and rules would be helpful. (The 
important thing is that the rules be the same for out-of-state 
participants) 

However, not everything has to be identical. For example, the suggested 
frequencies might be (purposely) different.

>I would much rather do a GA/AL or GA/SC ( or both )

You know, we should try this next year, and if it gets rolling, we should 
ask other states to join in. Does SC have a QSO party?

AL/GA/SC covers a lot of ground, but it is largely within the domain of 
the SECC. By that alone, we can guarantee a lot of activity.

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901



--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com