Fwd: [SECC] Activities Directors

[SteveWS4F@aol.com]

--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/5/01 04:40:54 PM Greenwich Standard Time, SteveWS4F 
writes:

> ARRL 10 Meter is a natural- multimode, and one we can win.  I definitely 
> favor going after ones we can win- it's a great incentive.  WPX is a 
natural 
> for the same reason, as Bill has pointed out.  Also, rotating contests year 
> to year might not be a bad idea, but it defeats the possibility of building 
> up knowledge and equipment aimed at one or two year after year.  I also 
favor 
> CQ 160 CW as a club project, and would like to see the SEDXC and SECC merge 
> efforts on this one in some way.

I meant ARRL 160 in the above, but CQ 160 CW would be good, too.

73,

Steve, K4RF 


--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: <SteveWS4F@aol.com>
From: SteveWS4F@aol.com
Full-name: SteveWS4F
Message-ID: <8b.eb6c0af.29181b16@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:40:54 EST
Subject: Re: [SECC] Activities Directors
To: gabnjb@earthlink.net, secc@contesting.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10

In a message dated 11/5/01 03:40:22 PM Greenwich Standard Time, 
gabnjb@earthlink.net writes:

> This list does not include so-called "major contests" -- SECC has had top
>  performances in SS, CQWW, ARRL DX and WPX.  But, there is no
>  clear perennial favorite -- some years SS gets everyone on, sometimes it's
>  CQWW Phone, sometimes its WPX.  I think we need to target a couple
>  each year for a club effort...
>  
>  CQWW CW? - ARRL DX CW? PHONE? - WPX PHONE? CW?
>  
>  Let us know!  Now, back to net...
>  
>  73, Gary
>  K9AY
>  SECC Prez
>  
>  
>  
>  --
>  SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/


ARRL 10 Meter is a natural- multimode, and one we can win.  I definitely 
favor going after ones we can win- it's a great incentive.  WPX is a natural 
for the same reason, as Bill has pointed out.  Also, rotating contests year 
to year might not be a bad idea, but it defeats the possibility of building 
up knowledge and equipment aimed at one or two year after year.  I also favor 
CQ 160 CW as a club project, and would like to see the SEDXC and SECC merge 
efforts on this one in some way.

73 to all,

Steve, K4RF

--part1_157.385e0b3.29181beb_boundary--

--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com