[SECC] GQP 2001 Results

[Michael Condon]

Yep,
It is done, and the GQP results are on the new page.  See
http://gqp.contesting.com for new layout and results for this year and prior
two years. That was done a couple weeks ago, and a note was sent out.  I
think I said we could release the "P" and certificate guys then.
The only residual for me is a few requests for mailed results, and getting
about $20 in donations received to Nancy for the treasury.  I also want to
spiff up the new site, and remove most of the duplicated material from the
SECC site regarding GQP.  I have had a couple of queries about GQP links on
the web, and have put out the new URL.  I will probably go through a more
serious effort later this year, early next, to get a lot of links on other
sites fixed, and even solicit link listings for GQP.
I also promised to make a GQP logging program for use next time.  That was
not an idle threat; my Rover logger is just now going out to a few hardy
folks for "Beta" now.  Rover/GQP will be a subset of Rover.
I have also put together a listing of recommendations, ruminations, and even
funny comments about changes to GQP.  After adding my observations, I will
forward it all to the club officers for possible use in a round of work and
discussion on changes for GQP.   (That email reminder note like CQP did is a
lay-up from the current DB)
But, all that is follow up work.  Some of that work will have to be handed
off to a new web tender next year, as I must opt out after March next year.
So onward and upward.

73, Mike, NE4S






-----Original Message-----
From: owner-secc@contesting.com [mailto:owner-secc@contesting.com]On Behalf
Of Gary Breed
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 8:34 PM
To: secc@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP 2001 Results

John, Mike and all...

I looked over the results when Mike first posted them to the new
gqp.contesting.com Web site.  Then Mike found one more little
snafu and fixed.  I can only assume that GQP is done and the world
can see the results.  I think Mike copied Jere on the final fixes to the
scores, but not 100% sure.

John K4BAI, would you post this to cq-contest?  I am not a
subscriber (an archive reader) and can't be sure they'll accept a post
from me. Thanks!

73, Gary
K9AY


> The last I heard, the results had been posted on our webpage, but the
> officers were to review them and advise if they could be released
> further.  I plan to put a note to the cq-contest reflector and the SEDXC
> reflector about their availability when I have been given the OK to do
> so.
>
> I believe Jere needs to have the go ahead for the certificates, Jay for
> the plaques, and someone needs to send the results to participants who
> don't get them by e-mail.  One year, Jere included the results with the
> certificates.  I don't think he did so last year and not everyone gets a
> certificate.  But they need to get a copy of the results to encourage
> them to enter again.
>
> I guess it would be possible to check the calls of the logs received in
> QRZ and send out some kind of a message about the availability of the
> results via e-mail and then someone could mail a copy to anyone not in
> QRZ or Buckmaster with an e-mail address and to those whose addresses
> turn out not to be good in those sources.  What do you think we should
> do in that regard?
>
> Mike, as I have mentioned before, I cannot seem to print a complete copy
> of the results.  The right side of the results runs off the paper.  I
> get a big blank side on the left due to the SECC logo at the top.  But,
> I can't seem to get the printer to do it any other way.  If you don't
> have an idea about how I can print my own copy, could you print a copy
> and bring it to NQ4I for me next weekend?
>
> I did the Ala QSO Party with a borrowed mobile at the end of Sept and
> had a ball in spite of there not being as much activity as in the GQP.
> This is definitely the way to have real fun in GQP.
>
> Mike, did you ever get a report as to how close we came to having
> activity from all 159 counties?  Maybe we could set a line at whatever
> the total was this year and try to improve that in the future.
>
> 73,
>
> John, K4BAI.
>
> --
> SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
>


--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com