[SECC] Logs Due

[Bill Fisher, W4AN]

Yea, its enough.  They don't look at your summary anyway.  They compute
your score, so don't worry if CT scored a mult wrong.  It don't matter.

73

Bill

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 n4uk@mindspring.com wrote:

> Bill, my logs for both were sent in last week. I do have a question
> though. Even though both sponsors say that the Cabrillo summary is
> good enough I noted that it really isn't a summary as it does not
> break down how many qsos and how many mults and qso points were
> worked. Is the Cabrillo summary good enough for the major contests?
> Anyone have any problems with this after submitting a log. I was, and
> still am, a little worried about this. Or maybe that's the whole
> purpose of the Cabrillo robot. To do all of this stuff
> automatically??? N4UK "Bill Fisher, W4AN" <w4an@contesting.com> wrote:
> > While most of you are off due to snow or ice, it might be a good
> time to get those logs in.
> 
> CQWW CW is due January 15th --------------------------- Send them to
> CW@CQWW.COM
> 
> 
> ARRL 160 is due January 8th --------------------------- Send them to
> 160meter@arrl.org
> 
> 
> Both require Cabrillo format.
> 
> 73
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> --
> SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
> 
> 
> 
> --
> SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
> 


--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com