[SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules

[Macie, Gordon]

it section not division...

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/01/29/1/?nc=1

Gordon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: K4SB [mailto:k4sb@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:24 PM
> To: secc@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules
> 
> 
> In the first place, I realize the value of all our members, and would
> hate to see some excluded.
> 
> In the second place, I am distinctly under the impression 
> that the rule
> change did NOT mention sections, but ARRL Divisions.
> If that is correct, we would lose SC, NC, and TN. But, we 
> would pick up
> FL, KP4, and KP2. Not to exclude some of our very proficient members,
> but if K4BAI, W4AN, and NQ4I were to operate from KP2 and 4, 
> our scores
> would increase dramatically.
> 
> If I misread the change, I would vote to keep the 175 rule also.
> 
> And keep in mind that this change ONLY affects ARRL contests.
> 
> I have been tracking log submissions from our NC members, and 
> find them
> to be almost non existant. At the very least,  I would like 
> to have the
> circle realigned. Our rules require 2 contest submissions per 
> year, and
> maybe it's time to enforce it.
> 
> I also see absolutely no problem with an associate club from 
> the Roanoke
> Division.
> 
> I merely suggested a motion, and it has a second. I am 
> perfectly willing
> to abide by a vote.
> 
> Now I have better things to do, namely, replacing 1/2 of the DE on my
> 15.
> 
> 73
> Ed
> 
> 
> 
> --
> SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
> 

--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com