[SECC] SS Phone 2001

[Macie, Gordon]

> I too hope Bridget will reconsider. I like the CW more than the phone,
> but got zapped also last year. Over 90% of the zaps ( don't even think
> of asking )were in the number in the call, leading me to think there
> is some sloppy CW going on. But in truth, the fact that I am far below
> the level of being legally deaf in the 1200-3000 cycle range (82bd
> down in the left ear and 78 in the right )
> 

My only excuse is lack of ability..

> 
> I'd like to pose a question to the group. Would it be considered
> proper conduct to compile a database of both the CW and Phone
> entrants? If enough people contributed their logs ( and I will be more
> than glad to compile the database ) we should have a 95+% chance of
> getting the correct calls. Then, it's a relative simple matter to
> compare your log against the database, and let it pop out calls which
> do not appear. For that matter, it could also do sections and
> precedent.
> 
> Heck, the logs from Bill and John would probably be sufficient.
> 

You can find these on the internet but I agree with Bill. Its not fair.

> But the important thing is, get on, even if for an hour or so. And
> maybe we need to make up a couple of teams to compete against each
> other. And forget Bill and John being on the same team!!
> 
> 73
> Ed

Interesting idea.. A little friendly internal competition.. Maybe we could put all the participants in a hat and draw teams randomly.. Except for Bill and John !!.. We could start with each of them being a team captain ???