[SECC] GQP-2004

[ku8e at bellsouth.net]

I would still like us to scale back the GQP to a Saturday only event. Maybe from  8AM - Midnight....

                   Jeff

> 
> From: "Tom Drake" <tbdrake at charter.net>
> Date: 2003/08/13 Wed PM 06:46:31 EDT
> To: "Jeff" <w4dd at arrl.net>,  <secc at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004
> 
> I really do agree with Ed. No need to continually argue about this.
> Besides,  Easter Sunday won't interrupt my contesting.  Probably use my
> wife's vehicle,  radio and gas money to do it.  Have to get a later start on
> Sunday to avoid the good people who are going to church for their second
> time each year.  Besides,  if the GQP floats,  give 10,000 bonus points for
> just finding it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff" <w4dd at arrl.net>
> To: <secc at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [SECC] GQP-2004
> 
> 
> > Perhaps voting on line for future issues is the answer.  Seems like the
> > hamfest attendance is too thin.
> >
> > Jeff,
> > W4DD
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com]On
> > Behalf Of Jeff Clarke
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:31 PM
> > To: secc at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004
> >
> >
> > I agree 100% with Ed...   This and other issues concerning GQP were hashed
> > over at
> > the meeting. In the end the majority ruled. It would be nice if we had
> more
> > meetings
> > per year so these issues could be decided by
> > all. Since I have been down here (13 months) I remember only 2 SECC
> > meetings. Both at
> > the Atlanta
> > Hamfest...
> >
> >                 Jeff
> >
> > =========================================================
> > Jeffrey D. Clarke 706-628-9672 email : ku8e at bellsouth.net
> > =========================================================
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "K4SB" <k4sb at earthlink.net>
> > To: <secc at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004
> >
> >
> > > Tom Drake wrote:
> > > > Maybe it's time for a re-vote
> > > ---------------------
> > > This matter was voted on and passed by an overwhelming majority. I see
> > > no reason to continually argue about this matter.
> > >
> > > 73
> > > Ed
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SECC mailing list
> > > SECC at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>