[SECC] Re:C&bls

K4SB k4sb at earthlink.net
Fri Dec 12 04:40:20 EST 2003


John Vickers wrote:
> WA4TT votes yes.................. and agrees with W4OC that all votes should
> be by the SECC mail reflector. This would include all interested parties and
> keep it simple and easy---- just like the SECC was intended to be from the
> beginning.
---------------
Just a note. Any member should be allowed to vote in secrecy if
he/she/it wants.

73
Ed


More information about the SECC mailing list