[SECC] SECC Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2003

Gary McConville wb4sq at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 30 13:27:06 EDT 2003


To equalize things out, why not just allow the paper
entries, but the ones who submit them have to check
everyone else's logs...

Gary


--- SteveWS4F at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/30/03 9:37:47 AM Eastern
> Daylight Time, 
> k4bai at worldnet.att.net writes:
> 
> 
> > Please let the record reflect a minority dissent
> from the electronic
> > submission requirement.  I am opposed to anything
> that might tend to
> > discourage participation in GQP and I am concerned
> that the rule will
> > probably do so.  I guess we are willing to go
> without the significant
> > number of US mail logs that Jeff just reported.  I
> recognize that in
> > Jeff's number of US mail submissions there are
> probably a few who mailed
> > in a disk and could be eligible for an award, but
> the rest were folks
> > who are still using paper (and probably still
> working CW!).  Some will
> > never get into the computer age and I hate to
> exclude them, or the
> > newcomer (paper is the easiest way to start), or
> the eastern European
> > guy who can't yet afford a computer.
> > 
> 
> I agree, John.  I understand why the log checkers
> want it that way, but it's 
> a shame to discourage participation in any way in a
> relatively low activity 
> contest.
> 
> 73 to all,
> 
> Steve, K4RF
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com


More information about the SECC mailing list