[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate

[Daniel Jeswald]

I already asked Mr. Hainey that question.  He said he didn't know of any
way.  BUt to hold on and see what happens.  Bullcrap.  

This is what nearly destroyed ham radio back in the sixties with incentive
licensing.  The ARRL doing what they dang well wanted to do without
consulting the hard core membership.  And I'm not talking of the 'new'
crowd that thinks ham radio is just super CB.

Dan/W4NTI


> [Original Message]
> From: Gary McConville <wb4sq at yahoo.com>
> To: <secc at contesting.com>
> Date: 1/19/04 10:03:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
>
> How do you get your money back from the ARRL if you're
> a lifetime member?
>
> WB4SQ
>
> --- K4SB <k4sb at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Well, about as expected.
> > 
> > Just when are we going to throw this board out for
> > good?
> > 
> > (:<
> > Ed
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc