[SECC]SS

[Macie, Gordon]

this sounds like our move the circle discussion. this maybe legal but surely
its not the intent of the rules. did each call work all bands ? so they
actually both used the same radio / antenna ??

-----Original Message-----
From: ku8e at bellsouth.net [mailto:ku8e at bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 4:27 PM
To: secc at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Re: [SECC]SS



 Actually here is the real story. I found this out from K9PG in Dayton....

  NCCC had several stations host two multi-ops going on from the same 
 station. For example, someone like N6RO, who is setup as a M/M could  
 run 2 multi-ops using two different calls - for example N6RO and NR6O. This
 is legal as long as each of the operators only operate using only one of
the 
 callsigns....

 K8CC has also done this the last couple years to maximize the MRRC score.


                           Jeff KU8E

> 
> From: John Laney <k4bai at worldnet.att.net>
> Date: 2004/10/25 Mon PM 01:10:44 EDT
> CC: SECC <secc at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC]SS
> 
> Yes, my recollection also is that the club competition is for combined 
> CW and SSB.  Maybe someone will read the official rules and make sure. 
> But I think that's the way it has always been.
> 
> You have no doubt read about the strategy developed by K4BVD for the 
> NCCC to beat the SMC in last year's SS.  They got a bunch of club and 
> multi op stations to get on and make a lot of QSOs using packet so as to 
> get as many mults as possible.  They weren't competing for individual 
> glory, but to maximize the club score.  And it worked!  As a side 
> effect, there sure were a lot of California stations to work in the SS 
> contests last year.
> 
> 73,
> 
> John, K4BAI.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 

_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc