TT Re: A long post about the SECC...was: Re: [SECC]

[Tommy]

BUT if you have to have this same discussion anually, doesn't that tell you
something?

I understand Lee's explanation and probably the reason for the group,
lacking the dense population where a club can be formed. A club however, is
not formed by what one ham think's is best, but by what the majority of
contesters would like to see in a contest club.

The SECC was established long before I came back to south Georgia, so that
is the  way  it is!

Tom - W4BQF

----- Original Message -----
From: "AE4Y" <ae4y at mindspring.com>
To: "SECC" <secc at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:52 PM
Subject: TT Re: A long post about the SECC...was: Re: [SECC]


> It looks like we're having our annual discussion on the nature and
> purpose of the SECC.  Not being able to say it any better than Lee
> already has, I'll defer to his comments; truncated below.
>
> I just wanted to (once again) go on the record as being in favor of
> keeping the club true to the principles and vision upon which it was
> founded.
>
> Kent, AE4Y
>
>
>
> Lee Hiers wrote:
>
> > But the SECC isn't broke and doesn't need fixing.
> >
> > BTW, I want to mention that the stuff that K4BAI posts on here every
> > week about the upcoming contests and member activities in those
> > contests is great, and exactly what we had in mind when we started
> > this thing.  I know John is doing it to help spur operating, and it
> > is a "good thing"  John has always been one of the most active and
> > best contesters in the state...and those traits are not unrelated.
> > I'm sure it's a lot of work for him and wanted to acknowledge it.
> >
> > 73 de Lee
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc