[SECC] W4AN on CQ cover

[Daniel Jeswald]

I have to agree....CQ is hands down the better choice.  I really hate to
say it but.....IF I wasn't a LIFER with the league I wouldn't waste my
money on a sub to QST.  I have thought this for years,  they need to
seperate the magazine from the league membership.  I think they would cut
costs (not needing to publish so many mags) and get more members.  

Just my ten cents worth.

Dan/W4NTI



> [Original Message]
> From: Courtney Judd - K4WI <k4wi at earthlink.net>
> To: David Thompson <thompson at mindspring.com>
> Cc: SECC <secc at contesting.com>
> Date: 9/22/04 6:19:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover
>
> I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I support CQ
> 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands down..
> entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home a first place SO
> USA 10 mtrs in CQ rtty WPX 2004 qualified for a plaque but no sponsers but
> tickle me pink! 73's Cort K4WI
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc